T Cell Receptor Multimers for High-Avidity pMHC Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing T cell therapies for cancer treatment, such as TIL, engineered TCR, and CAR T cell therapy, face limitations in efficacy, safety, and tolerability, necessitating improved agents and methods for determining TCR-pMHC interactions and modulating T cell responses.

Innovation Solution

Development of TCR multimers comprising a TCR moiety linked to a multimerization moiety from IgM or IgA, forming multivalent and soluble molecules with high avidity for pMHC complexes, potentially incorporating effector moieties for therapeutic applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing T cell therapies (TIL, engineered TCR, CAR T cell therapy) are used for cancer treatment, then therapeutic effect is achieved, but limitations in efficacy, safety, and tolerability occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidsafety and tolerability issues
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The T cell therapy approach is segmented into modular components: a TCR moiety for antigen recognition, a multimerization moiety for forming multivalent structures, and optional effector moieties for therapeutic action. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component's function and safety profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates composite therapeutic molecules by fusing the TCR moiety with the multimerization moiety from IgM or IgA. This composite structure combines the antigen-specificity of TCRs with the multivalent binding capability of immunoglobulins, achieving enhanced efficacy while maintaining safety through controlled multimerization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If monovalent TCR molecules are used, then antigen specificity is maintained, but binding avidity to pMHC complexes is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantigen specificityVSAvoidbinding avidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple TCR moieties are merged into a single multimeric structure through the multimerization moiety, creating molecules with multiple antigen-binding sites. This merging increases the overall binding avidity to pMHC complexes while each individual TCR moiety maintains its specific antigen recognition capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The binding interaction is enhanced by transitioning from monovalent (single binding site) to multivalent (multiple binding sites) architecture. This dimensional change in binding capacity allows simultaneous engagement of multiple pMHC complexes, dramatically increasing avidity while preserving specificity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Power

If TCR multimers are designed for high avidity binding, then therapeutic potency is enhanced, but molecular complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic potencyVSAvoidmolecular structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multimerization moiety from IgM or IgA serves multiple functions: it enables multivalent binding to increase potency, provides a well-characterized structural framework, and offers established expression and purification protocols. This universality reduces the practical complexity despite the enhanced molecular functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The valency parameter of the TCR molecule is changed from 1 to multiple binding sites through the multimerization moiety. This parameter change directly increases therapeutic potency while the modular design allows systematic control of the complexity level by selecting different multimerization domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If adoptive T cell transfer or CAR-based therapy is used, then cancer treatment effect is achieved, but safety and tolerability limitations occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecancer treatment effectVSAvoidsafety and tolerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The TCR multimer acts as an intermediary therapeutic agent that bridges antigen recognition and T cell activation without requiring direct engineering of patient T cells. This intermediary approach maintains the therapeutic effect while reducing the safety and tolerability issues associated with cellular therapies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250326844A1T cell receptor multimers and uses thereof
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 COGEN IMMUNE MEDICINE INC
  • US20250326844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250326844A1 patent drawing
  • US20250326844A1 patent drawing

AI summary

T cell receptor (TCR) multimers are provided in which a binding moiety from a T cell receptor variable region is attached to a multimerization moiety from IgM or IgA to thereby create a multivalent TCR multimer composition. The TCR multimers can be used, for example, to determine the binding specificity of the TCR-derived binding moiety, such as for particular MHC-peptide complexes. The multimers can also be used, for example, to modulate an immune response in a subject by administering the multimer to the subject. Methods of making the TCR multimers are also provided.