T-Cell Receptor Sequence Optimization Using RL and AVIB Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Optimizing T-cell receptor (TCR) sequences for enhanced affinity and conformational flexibility is challenging due to the complexity of the TCR complex, requiring significant computational resources and time.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement-learning framework using variational information bottleneck with attention of experts (AVIB classifiers) and proximal policy optimization (PPO) models is employed to fine-tune TCR sequences, clustering them based on k-mer profiles to achieve higher binding scores and validate biological functional potency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If structural biology approaches are used to model TCR binding, then the model can provide structural insights, but the conformational flexibility of the TCR complex makes binding difficult to model

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding affinity measurementVSAvoidTCR complex conformational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional structural biology approaches with machine learning models that process sequence data to predict TCR binding affinity. The AVIB classifier and reinforcement learning framework substitute physical structural modeling with computational sequence analysis, avoiding the complexities of modeling conformational flexibility while achieving accurate binding predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the problem from modeling three-dimensional structural flexibility to analyzing sequence space parameters. By representing TCRs as sequences and using k-mer profiles, the approach changes the parameter space from structural coordinates to sequence composition features, making the problem tractable through machine learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If machine learning methods are used to design TCR of higher affinity, then the affinity can be improved, but the computational resources and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTCR affinityVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary clustering of TCR sequences based on k-mer profiles before applying reinforcement learning. This pre-organization of the sequence space allows the reinforcement learning algorithm to focus on optimizing within smaller, more manageable clusters rather than searching the entire sequence space, significantly reducing computational time while maintaining high affinity optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the TCR sequence optimization problem into multiple independent clusters based on k-mer similarity. Each cluster represents a subset of sequences with similar characteristics, allowing parallel processing and reducing the overall computational burden while achieving high affinity designs through focused optimization within each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If TCR sequences are optimized for higher affinity, then the antigen recognition improves, but the conformational flexibility may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveantigen recognitionVSAvoidconformational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality optimization by focusing mutations and sequence modifications specifically on the complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) that directly contact the antigen, while leaving the framework regions that maintain structural flexibility relatively unchanged. This allows improved antigen recognition through localized sequence optimization without compromising overall conformational flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250384962A1T-cell receptor complex optimization with reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA INC
  • US20250384962A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384962A1 patent drawing
  • US20250384962A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for particularly t-cell receptor complex optimization with reinforcement learning. Classifiers using variational information bottleneck with attention of experts (AVIB classifiers) can be fine-tuned for different representations of desired t-cell receptor (TCR) sequences for a patient. Proximal policy optimization (PPO) models can be trained with reinforcement learning using the AVIB classifiers as reward functions to achieve higher affinity in generating interaction sequences for the desired TCR sequences through automated decision making. The interaction sequences can be clustered based on k-mer profiles to select the interaction sequences having highest binding scores in each cluster as final sequences. A biological functional potency of the final sequences can be validated.