TCR Optimization via Reinforcement Learning Mutation Policies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computational methods for optimizing T-cell receptors (TCRs) for immunotherapy are time-consuming and inefficient, as they fail to generate high-affinity TCRs tailored to recognize specific peptides, and do not validate the generated sequences effectively.

Innovation Solution

A deep reinforcement learning framework, TCRPPO, is developed to optimize TCRs using a mutation policy, incorporating a reward function that measures both the validity and recognition probability of mutated sequences, leveraging a TCR auto-encoder and peptide-TCR binding predictors to generate qualified TCRs with high binding scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If current computational methods are used to optimize TCRs, then the process can be completed, but it is time-consuming and inefficient with low success rate in generating high-affinity TCRs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization speedVSAvoidsuccess rate in generating high-affinity TCRs
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through reward functions that evaluate generated TCR sequences using binding affinity predictors and validity checkers. The reinforcement learning agent continuously receives feedback on the quality of generated TCRs and adjusts its generation strategy accordingly, improving both speed and success rate through iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional brute-force computational methods with a reinforcement learning-based generative model. This substitution of the computational approach dramatically reduces optimization time while improving the reliability of generating high-affinity TCRs through learned patterns from training data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If traditional TCR optimization methods are used, then computation can be performed, but they fail to effectively validate the generated sequences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity of generated TCR sequencesVSAvoidvalidation framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary validation by integrating binding affinity predictors and TCR validity checkers into the generation process itself. Sequences are validated during generation rather than after, ensuring high validity while managing complexity through integrated rather than separate validation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary validation components (binding affinity predictors and validity checkers) that mediate between the generative model and the final TCR output. These intermediaries provide structured validation feedback without requiring the entire system to become overly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If reinforcement learning with mutation policies is implemented, then TCRs with maximum binding scores can be generated, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding score optimizationVSAvoiddeep reinforcement learning framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex reinforcement learning framework into distinct functional modules: a policy network for mutation decisions, a value network for evaluation, binding affinity predictors for scoring, and validity checkers for verification. This segmentation manages complexity by organizing the system into independent, manageable components with clear interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240185948A1T-cell receptor optimization with reinforcement learning and mutation policies for precision immunotherapy
Publication Date: 2024.06.06 NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA INC
  • US20240185948A1 patent drawing
  • US20240185948A1 patent drawing
  • US20240185948A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for implementing deep reinforcement learning with T-cell receptor (TCR) mutation policies to generate binding TCRs recognizing target peptides for immunotherapy is presented. The method includes extracting peptides to identify a virus or tumor cells, collecting a library of TCRs from target patients, predicting, by a deep neural network, interaction scores between the extracted peptides and the TCRs from the target patients, developing a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework with TCR mutation policies to generate TCRs with maximum binding scores, defining reward functions based on a reconstruction-based score and a density estimation-based score, randomly sampling batches of TCRs and following a policy network to mutate the TCRs, outputting mutated TCRs, and ranking the outputted TCRs to utilize top-ranked TCR candidates to target the virus or the tumor cells for immunotherapy.