Quasi Full Duplex TDD Access Point Interference Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Time division duplexing (TDD) systems face desensitization of receiver components due to strong RF transmission signals, and traditional self-interference cancellation methods struggle to achieve unconditional cancellation in dynamic environments, leading to interference and reduced signal quality for user equipment (UEs) at a distance from the base station.

Innovation Solution

A communication system that monitors signal quality and adjusts transmission power in quasi-full duplex mode, either by fully muting or proportionally reducing Tx power when signal quality falls below a threshold, and restoring full power once quality improves, while also using intelligent resource block management to assign UEs to subchannels based on their distance from the base station, minimizing interference and ensuring reliable signal reception.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If self-interference cancellation systems are used to prevent desensitization of Rx path, then receiver sensitivity is improved, but device complexity increases and cancellation capability is limited in dynamic environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereceiver sensitivityVSAvoidSIC system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic UL-DL switch point adjustment based on real-time signal quality monitoring. The system continuously monitors Rx signal quality and adapts the TDD switching points to prevent desensitization events, transitioning from static to dynamic operation to maintain receiver sensitivity without requiring complex SIC systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where Rx signal quality is continuously monitored and used to adjust UL-DL switch points. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond to changing channel conditions and prevent desensitization by adapting transmission parameters based on received signal quality measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If Tx power is reduced to prevent desensitization during UL transmission, then receiver protection is improved, but downlink signal quality for distant UEs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTx interference to Rx pathVSAvoiddownlink signal quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts UL-DL switch points based on monitored signal quality and UE distance. For distant UEs, the system maintains higher Tx power longer by adjusting switch points, while for near UEs it reduces Tx power earlier to prevent desensitization. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between protecting the Rx path and maintaining downlink quality for distant UEs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different Tx power reduction strategies based on local conditions, specifically UE distance from the base station. Distant UEs receive full or reduced power during DL transmissions while near UEs experience more aggressive power reduction to prevent desensitization, allowing differentiated treatment based on spatial location and signal conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Area of stationary object

If Tx power is increased to serve distant UEs, then coverage is improved, but interference to Rx path increases causing desensitization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidTx signal interference to Rx components
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains extended coverage by using high Tx power for DL transmissions to distant UEs while dynamically adjusting UL-DL switch points to prevent desensitization during UL reception. The dynamic switching enables the system to operate in quasi-full-duplex mode, maintaining coverage area while managing self-interference through adaptive timing adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If traditional TDD switch points are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but signal quality for near UEs during UL reception deteriorates due to desensitization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTDD switching simplicityVSAvoidUL signal quality from near UEs
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic UL-DL switch point adjustment that adapts to UE distance and signal conditions. For near UEs, the switch points are adjusted to occur earlier, preventing desensitization of the Rx path during their UL transmissions. This maintains simple TDD operation while improving UL signal quality for near UEs through adaptive timing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240205839A1Communication system with time division duplexing access point operation in quasi full duplex mode
Publication Date: 2024.06.20 OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
  • US20240205839A1 patent drawing
  • US20240205839A1 patent drawing
  • US20240205839A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of reducing interference in a time division duplexing access point during a quasi-full duplex mode in a communication system is provided. The method includes monitoring a signal quality of received signals from at least one user equipment (UE) at a base station. Transmission power used to a transmit signals from the base station is lowered when the monitored signal quality goes below a threshold. Full transmission power to transmit signals is restored once the signal quality of the received signals is above the threshold.