TEAD Inhibitor Dosing Regimen for Kidney Toxicity Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current TEAD inhibitors face challenges with kidney toxicity as a safety concern, particularly with long-term treatment, necessitating a dosing regimen that balances efficacy with reduced adverse side effects.

Innovation Solution

Administering a TEAD inhibitor on each of the first 3 days of a 7-day treatment cycle, with at least two treatment cycles, to reduce kidney toxicity while maintaining therapeutic efficacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If continuous daily dosing of TEAD inhibitor is administered, then therapeutic efficacy is maintained, but kidney toxicity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic efficacyVSAvoidkidney toxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic dosing by administering the TEAD inhibitor only on days 1, 2, and 3 of each 7-day treatment cycle, creating a pulsing dosing pattern with 4 days off between treatment cycles. This periodic administration maintains therapeutic efficacy while allowing kidney recovery periods, thereby reducing cumulative kidney toxicity compared to continuous daily dosing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment regimen is segmented into distinct treatment cycles of 7 days, with each cycle containing only 3 days of active drug administration. This segmentation divides the continuous treatment into discrete intervals, allowing the kidneys to recover during the non-administration periods while still achieving cumulative therapeutic effect over multiple cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If TEAD inhibitor dosing is reduced to lower kidney toxicity, then adverse side effects decrease, but therapeutic efficacy may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekidney toxicityVSAvoidtherapeutic efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by designing multiple treatment cycles (at least two cycles) where the drug is administered on days 1-3 of each cycle. This repeated periodic administration maintains cumulative therapeutic exposure and sustained efficacy while the 4-day breaks between cycles provide kidney recovery time, thus preserving therapeutic action while reducing toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20240358720A1Dosing Regimen for a TEAD inhibitor
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 NOVARTIS AG
  • US20240358720A1 patent drawing
  • US20240358720A1 patent drawing
  • US20240358720A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a TEAD inhibitor or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof for use in the treatment of cancer, wherein the TEAD inhibitor is administered on each of the first 3 days of a 7 day treatment cycle, and wherein the treatment comprises at least two treatment cycles.