Technical Specification Matching via Feature Importance Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies face challenges in efficiently matching technical specifications between consumers and manufacturers due to differences in language and complexity in technical descriptions, requiring technically trained personnel and scattered information across multiple sources.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing trained language models and neural networks to identify and calculate the importance of technical features, enabling the calculation of matching scores between consumer specifications and vendor descriptions, thereby facilitating the identification of suitable products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual matching of technical specifications is performed by technically trained personnel, then matching accuracy is improved, but labor cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual review process with an automated NLP-based system. The system uses trained language models to extract technical features from specifications and calculate matching scores automatically, eliminating the need for manual technical personnel while maintaining high matching accuracy through sophisticated algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service matching by automatically processing technical specifications and generating match results without human intervention. The automated feature extraction and scoring mechanisms allow the system to serve itself in identifying suitable products, freeing up technical personnel for more complex tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If comprehensive technical feature extraction is performed across multiple sources, then matching completeness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching completenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex task of matching into distinct components: feature extraction, feature representation, and matching score calculation. By dividing the process into modular stages with specialized models for each function, the system achieves comprehensive feature extraction while managing complexity through structured organization of processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate representations (feature vectors and embeddings) that mediate between raw technical specifications and final matching scores. These intermediate structures serve as standardized interfaces that simplify the integration of information from multiple diverse sources while maintaining comprehensive feature capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If detailed technical feature analysis is performed, then matching precision is improved, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching precisionVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on the most discriminative technical features rather than processing all features equally. The system identifies and prioritizes key features that have the greatest impact on matching accuracy, performing detailed analysis only where necessary while using simpler processing for less critical features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20220343159A1Technical specification matching
Publication Date: 2022.10.27 NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA INC
  • US20220343159A1 patent drawing
  • US20220343159A1 patent drawing
  • US20220343159A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for detail matching. The method includes training a feature classifier to identify technical features, and training a neural network model for a trained importance calculator to calculate an importance value for each identified technical feature. The method further includes receiving a specification sheet including a plurality of technical features, and receiving a plurality of descriptive sheets each including a plurality of technical features. The method further includes identifying the technical features in the specification sheet and the plurality of descriptive sheets using the trained feature classifier, and calculating an importance for each identified technical feature using the trained feature importance calculator. The method further includes calculating a matching score between the identified technical features of the specification sheet and the identified technical features of the plurality of descriptive sheets based on the importance of each identified technical feature.