Technician Assignment Interface Using Performance Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Repair shops face inefficiencies in assigning vehicle service jobs to technicians due to turnover and lack of familiarity with newly hired staff, leading to suboptimal job allocation and reduced shop efficiency and profitability.

Innovation Solution

A computing device system that receives and analyzes technician performance data to generate scoring metrics for vehicle service jobs, suggesting optimal technician assignments based on past performance, thereby providing a technician assignment interface for efficient job distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If technicians are assigned to service jobs manually without performance data analysis, then the assignment process is simple and quick, but the shop efficiency and profitability decrease due to suboptimal job allocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshop efficiencyVSAvoidassignment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of technician performance data before job assignment occurs. By pre-calculating scoring metrics based on past performance, the system prepares optimization recommendations in advance, allowing manual assigners to make informed decisions quickly without complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computing device that acts as a mediator between technicians and service jobs. This intermediary analyzes performance data and provides scoring metrics, simplifying the assignment process while improving efficiency by removing the need for complex manual evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If technician performance data is collected and analyzed to determine optimal assignments, then job allocation efficiency improves, but the complexity of the assignment system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejob allocation efficiencyVSAvoidassignment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically analyzing technician performance data and generating scoring metrics without requiring complex manual intervention. The computing device autonomously processes performance data, calculates metrics, and provides assignment recommendations, reducing the need for complex human-in-the-loop decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual performance evaluation with an automated computing system. Instead of human managers manually assessing technician capabilities, the system uses automated data analysis and scoring metrics to determine optimal assignments, reducing system complexity while improving efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Quantity of substance

If new technicians are hired to increase capacity, then the shop can handle more service jobs, but the lack of familiarity with new staff leads to suboptimal assignments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetechnician capacityVSAvoidassignment optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously collecting and analyzing technician performance data. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from past performances and improve assignment recommendations over time, ensuring that both new and experienced technicians are optimally assigned based on objective metrics rather than manager familiarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of new technician performance data as soon as it becomes available, establishing baseline scoring metrics early in their tenure. This allows the system to quickly integrate new technicians into the assignment process with data-driven recommendations, eliminating the transition period where manual familiarity-based assignment would be suboptimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If service jobs are completed faster to increase productivity, then the shop processes more vehicles, but the comeback rate may increase if quality is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice job completion rateVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by matching specific technicians to specific job types based on their demonstrated expertise and performance metrics. Instead of assigning jobs uniformly or randomly, the system ensures that each technician receives assignments aligned with their proven capabilities, maintaining high quality standards while optimizing overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces subjective quality assessment with objective performance data analysis. By using quantifiable scoring metrics based on actual performance history, the system objectively evaluates which technician is best suited for each job, ensuring quality consistency without relying on manager judgment or compromising speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10733548B2Technician assignment interface
Publication Date: 2020.08.04 SNAP ON INC
  • US10733548B2 patent drawing
  • US10733548B2 patent drawing
  • US10733548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method includes receiving a plurality of vehicle service jobs to be performed in a given time window. The method further includes receiving technician performance data for a plurality of technicians, wherein the technician performance data for a given technician is indicative of past performances by the given technician of one or more of the vehicle service jobs. The method additionally includes determining, based on the technician performance data, a plurality of scoring metrics corresponding to the plurality of vehicle service jobs for each of the plurality of technicians. The method also includes determining, based on the scoring metrics, suggested technician assignments of individual technicians of the plurality of technicians to each vehicle service job of the plurality of vehicle service jobs. The method further includes providing, for presentation on a display, a technician assignment interface that shows the suggested technician assignments.