Telecommunication Alarm Management with Machine Learning Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing alarm management systems in telecommunication networks are inefficient and rely on subjective data, leading to incorrect prioritization and loss of important alarms, and fail to provide comprehensive analysis of all generated alarms.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning-based system that calculates alarm importance degree using properties like duration, severity, and geographical location, and predicts alarm behavior based on operator actions, automatically triggering actions and reducing the need for manual updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If deterministic rules based on domain-knowledge are used for alarm analysis and filtering, then the alarm management system can operate with clear decision criteria, but the system loses the ability to capture complex patterns and correlations that require human expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm analysis automationVSAvoiddomain-knowledge loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces neural networks as intermediary components that bridge deterministic rules and complex domain knowledge. The neural networks process alarm data and generate predictions about alarm behavior, which then inform the deterministic rule-based system. This intermediary layer captures complex patterns from historical data without requiring explicit programming of domain expertise, thereby maintaining automation while preserving knowledge representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical rule-based systems with intelligent systems using neural networks. Instead of manually programming deterministic rules to capture all domain knowledge, the system uses machine learning models that automatically learn patterns from historical alarm data, operator actions, and alarm correlations, substituting the mechanical rule-engine with an adaptive intelligent system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If all network alarms are provided to the NOC for analysis, then complete information is available for fault resolution, but operator burden and time required for root cause identification increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm information completenessVSAvoidoperator time for alarm analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by using neural networks to predict alarm behavior, duration, and resolution likelihood before alarms reach the NOC. The system pre-processes alarms by analyzing historical patterns and generating predictions about which alarms are likely to be transient or require immediate attention. This preliminary analysis filters and prioritizes alarms before they burden operators, reducing the volume of alarms requiring manual review while maintaining information completeness for critical issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the alarm stream into different categories based on predicted behavior and characteristics. Neural networks classify alarms into groups such as transient alarms, critical alarms, and alarms requiring operator intervention. This segmentation allows the system to apply different handling strategies to different alarm types, presenting only the most relevant segmented alarm sets to operators rather than the complete unfiltered alarm stream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual updates and operator intervention are used for alarm management, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but the time required for alarm resolution and operator burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm management flexibilityVSAvoidalarm resolution speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service capabilities where the alarm management system automatically performs updates and actions based on neural network predictions. The system autonomously adjusts alarm priorities, generates notifications, and triggers remediation actions without requiring constant manual operator intervention. This self-service approach maintains adaptability through learned patterns while significantly reducing the time required for alarm resolution by eliminating manual steps in the workflow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where neural networks continuously learn from operator actions and alarm resolution outcomes. The system uses feedback from historical data about which alarms required manual intervention and how they were resolved to improve future predictions and automated responses. This feedback mechanism maintains flexibility by adapting to new patterns while increasing productivity through increasingly accurate automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4264903B1Telecommunication network alarm management
Publication Date: 2025.08.20 TELECOM ITALIA SPA
  • EP4264903B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4264903B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4264903B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system (100) for managing network alarms (NA) generated by element manager modules (110(j)) in response to corresponding faults/malfunctioning affecting network nodes (105(i)) or links of a telecommunication network is disclosed. The system comprises:5- an alarm management platform (120) configured to gather the network alarms (NA) and to accordingly generate a first set (FSNA) of network alarms comprising at least a subset of the gathered network alarms (NA);- a network operator unit (130) configured to arrange the network alarms of the first set (FSNA) into a network alarm table (NT) providing for each network alarm 0listed in the network alarm table (NT) data describing the network alarm, the network operator unit (130) being further configured to manage the faults/malfunctioning affecting the network nodes or links corresponding to said network alarms (NA) by exploiting said network alarm table (NT);- an alarm prediction module (170) configured to receive from the alarm 5management platform (120) an alarm duration prediction request (PR(d)) about a predicted duration of a selected network alarm (NA) and alarm data (AD') regarding said selected network alarm (NA) and accordingly generate an alarm duration prediction (AP(d)) about a predicted duration of said selected network alarm (NA) by processing said alarm data (AD') regarding said selected network alarm (NA) through0a first machine learning algorithm trained with alarm data (AD) regarding past network alarms (NA) gathered by the AM system, wherein:- the alarm management platform (120) is configured to generate said at least a subset of the gathered network alarms (NA) for generating said first set (FSNA) of network alarms conditioned to said alarm duration predictions (AP(d)).