Telecommunication Service Dependency Discovery and Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing telecommunication service dependencies rely on manual processes, lack a central registry, and fail to account for environmental changes, leading to errors, incomplete information, and increased risk of service failures.

Innovation Solution

A central platform for registering and tracking telecommunication service dependencies, evaluating actual vs. declared dependencies, and triggering actions based on these, such as notifications and pipeline failures, to ensure consistency and manage dependencies across environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual processes are used for managing telecommunication service dependencies, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to errors and incomplete information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedependency management reliabilityVSAvoidmanual process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic dependency discovery and validation without requiring manual intervention. The evaluation module autonomously executes operations, monitors network traffic, and identifies actual dependencies, eliminating the need for manual dependency management while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical processes for dependency tracking are replaced with an automated electronic system that uses source code analysis and network traffic monitoring to automatically discover and evaluate dependencies, thereby improving reliability without increasing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a central registry for tracking dependencies is implemented, then reliability improves through complete information tracking, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedependency tracking accuracyVSAvoidcentral platform complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The central platform performs multiple functions including dependency registration, tracking, evaluation, and validation within a single system. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems, managing complexity while improving dependency tracking accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The central platform acts as an intermediary between service providers and dependency information, centralizing the management of dependency data and providing a single point of access that improves tracking accuracy without proportionally increasing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If actual dependencies are evaluated against declared dependencies, then manufacturing precision improves through error identification, but loss of time increases due to additional evaluation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedependency declaration accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs dependency evaluation in advance during the service deployment process, identifying discrepancies between declared and actual dependencies before they cause service failures. This preliminary detection improves accuracy while minimizing time loss by preventing future errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback by comparing actual dependencies with declared dependencies and notifying service providers of discrepancies. This feedback mechanism improves dependency declaration accuracy by enabling continuous correction and validation, reducing time loss through targeted improvements rather than exhaustive re-evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If services are distributed across multiple environments, then adaptability improves, but reliability deteriorates due to environmental changes affecting dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental deployment flexibilityVSAvoidservice consistency across environments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates dependencies in the context of specific environmental parameters, allowing dependency definitions to adapt to different environments (development, testing, production) while maintaining consistency through standardized evaluation criteria that account for environmental variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250338148A1Evaluating telecommunication services based on dependencies systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 T MOBILE US INC
  • US20250338148A1 patent drawing
  • US20250338148A1 patent drawing
  • US20250338148A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for managing dependencies for telecommunication services, such as software applications, are disclosed. To evaluate a telecommunication service comprising a software application, a set of declared dependencies are accessed for the service. The declared dependencies include services upon which the telecommunication service depends. Actual dependencies are identified for the telecommunication service, such as by analyzing operations performed by the telecommunication service based on network traffic between the telecommunication service and one or more other services. The telecommunication service is evaluated by comparing the actual dependencies to the declared dependencies. For example, the system can evaluate whether actual dependencies are consistent with dependencies specified in an architecture or design for the telecommunication service.