Telecommunications Line Impedance Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for estimating properties of telecommunications transmission lines, particularly line inductance, suffer from inaccuracies that affect DSL transmission capacity predictions, with current methods providing about 30% accuracy and limited applicability to higher frequencies and longer lines.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves using a priori knowledge of line capacitance to solve the relationship Zin·jωĈ=Γcoth(Γ) numerically for each angular frequency, generating independent solutions for each frequency and adapting starting points to improve accuracy, allowing for better estimation of line resistance and inductance, even for frequencies and line lengths where |Γ|>π.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the polynomial method with multiple frequencies is used to estimate line constants, then more equations are available for solving, but the inductance estimate accuracy remains poor at about 30%

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinductance estimate accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter being solved for - instead of directly solving for line constants (R, L, C) using polynomial methods, it transforms the problem to solve for the propagation constant γ first, then derives line constants from γ. This parameter transformation enables much higher accuracy in inductance estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the polynomial algebraic system with a transcendental equation system based on hyperbolic functions (coth). This substitution of mathematical approach allows for more accurate representation of the transmission line physics, particularly for higher frequencies where the polynomial approximation breaks down.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the restriction |Γ|<π is applied to ensure solution validity, then mathematical correctness is maintained, but applicability to higher frequencies and longer lines is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to higher frequenciesVSAvoidsolution validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of restricting the frequency range to maintain solution validity, the patent inverts the approach by developing a method that remains valid for all frequencies. It uses the relationship Zin·jωĈ=Γcoth(Γ) which can be solved numerically for Γ at any frequency, then derives line constants from the complex Γ value without requiring |Γ|<π.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Measurement precision

If double-ended line testing is performed to improve measurement accuracy, then better property estimates are obtained, but the complexity and cost of testing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveline property measurement accuracyVSAvoidtesting complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and utilizes only the essential measurement requirement - single-ended input impedance measurement - while eliminating the need for double-ended testing. By focusing on the fundamental relationship between Zin, γ, and line constants, it achieves accurate property estimation with simplified testing methodology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8781078B2Method for estimating transmission properties of a telecommunications transmission line
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US8781078B2 patent drawing
  • US8781078B2 patent drawing
  • US8781078B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Transmission properties of a telecommunications transmission line may be estimated with improved accuracy by numerical solution for Γ of Zin·jω^C=Γcoth(Γ). At least one curve is adapted to Γ solutions already obtained and a starting point for numerical solution is selected in dependence of the at least one curve and in dependence of an already obtained solution close in frequency. In a first frequency range, starting points for numerical solution may be calculated from a biquadratic equation. In a second frequency range, a line in the complex plane may be adapted to solutions already obtained and new starting points selected in dependence of the line and in dependence of the previous solution. In a third frequency range, two lines in the frequency plane may be adapted to solutions already obtained and new starting points selected in dependence of the lines.