Telecommunications Network Model Reduction for Faster Failure Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for modeling and simulating telecommunications networks are computationally burdensome and time-consuming due to the complexity of large networks with thousands of components and millions of transmission paths, requiring hours or days to complete simulations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving generating an initial network model, applying transformations to combine similar nodes and edges, and reducing the number of nodes and edges, followed by simulating failure scenarios using routing schemes like ECMP, shortest path, and Label-Switched Paths to optimize computational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional simulation techniques are used to model large telecommunications networks, then simulation accuracy is maintained, but computational time and resources become excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the large telecommunications network into multiple sub-networks or regions, modeling each segment separately with appropriate detail level. This segmentation allows the system to maintain accuracy for critical components while using simplified models for less critical areas, dramatically reducing overall computational time while preserving simulation accuracy where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different levels of modeling detail to different parts of the network based on their importance and complexity. Critical network components are modeled with high detail and accuracy, while non-critical components use simplified models. This local quality approach ensures simulation accuracy is concentrated where most needed while reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If detailed modeling of each network component and transmission path is performed, then simulation accuracy is improved, but device complexity and computational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimulation accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network model into hierarchical levels, with detailed models for critical components and aggregated models for less critical areas. This segmentation reduces model complexity by eliminating the need to represent every single component with equal detail, while maintaining accuracy for the most important network elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple similar network components into aggregated representations when they share common characteristics and behavior. This merging reduces model complexity by representing groups of components with single equivalent models, while still capturing the essential behavior and performance characteristics of the underlying detailed system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the entire network is simulated in detail, then comprehensive results are obtained, but productivity and efficiency of the modeling process decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive analysisVSAvoidmodeling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the comprehensive network analysis into multiple manageable segments that can be modeled and simulated independently. This segmentation enables parallel processing and faster computation while maintaining comprehensive coverage of the entire network. Critical segments are analyzed in detail while less critical segments use simplified models, improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis to identify which network segments and components require detailed modeling versus simplified modeling. By pre-classifying network elements based on their importance and impact, the system can allocate computational resources efficiently, performing comprehensive analysis only where necessary and using simplified models elsewhere, thereby improving productivity without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250247301A1Systems and methods for modeling and optimizing a telecommunications network
Publication Date: 2025.07.31 CENTURYLINK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC
  • US20250247301A1 patent drawing
  • US20250247301A1 patent drawing
  • US20250247301A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure include systems, methods, computing devices, computer-implemented methods, and the like for modeling and/or simulating performance of a telecommunications network during one or more failure scenarios that reduces computational time and/or power over previous simulation techniques. Modeling and simulating the network may include generating an initial network model from network data information and applying one or more transformations to the initial network model to reduce the size of the model. Following transformation, simulation methods may be applied to the generated network model based on routing characteristics of the components of the network. To reduce the computations utilized to simulate such components and/or routing decisions in the network, one or more simulation algorithms may be applied to the transformed network model to reduce the number of routing decisions simulated.