Telecom Node Priority Configuration Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The lack of a uniform priority identification standard for protocol data units in communications networks leads to tedious and error-prone individual configuration of nodes, affecting the quality of service for temporally-sensitive content like VoIP telephony, as existing methods for detecting improperly configured nodes are inefficient.

Innovation Solution

Concurrently transmitting two streams of protocol data units, one with high priority and one with low priority, through a node, and increasing the frequency of protocol data units to burden the node's processing capabilities, ensuring differential treatment and re-configuring if necessary to prioritize high-priority streams effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual configuration of nodes is performed according to service provider policies, then priority treatment for high-priority protocol data units can be achieved, but the configuration process becomes tedious and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority treatment reliabilityVSAvoidconfiguration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically detecting whether nodes are properly configured to provide priority treatment. The configuration management system transmits test streams and autonomously determines if re-configuration is needed, eliminating manual configuration tasks and reducing errors while maintaining reliable priority treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If high-frequency protocol data units are transmitted to burden the node, then differential treatment between priority streams can be detected, but the quality of service for low-priority streams deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration detection precisionVSAvoidquality of service reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the protocol data units into distinct high-priority and low-priority streams with different priority identifiers. By transmitting these segmented streams separately through the node under test, the system can precisely measure whether the node correctly differentiates between priority levels without requiring excessive traffic that would degrade overall service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial burdening by transmitting test streams at elevated frequencies only to the extent necessary to detect configuration issues. The high-frequency transmission is applied selectively to trigger differential treatment detection while monitoring quality of service metrics to ensure the burden does not excessively degrade low-priority stream performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Stability of the object's composition

If uniform priority identification standard is implemented, then configuration consistency across nodes can be achieved, but adaptability to different service provider policies is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration consistencyVSAvoidservice provider policy adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by designing a configuration management approach that works across different service provider policies. The test methodology and detection mechanisms are universally applicable to various priority identification standards and node configurations, while the system adapts to specific service provider requirements through automated policy-based configuration rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7843826B2Automatic detection and re-configuration of priority status in telecommunications networks
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 SIGNAL POINT NETWORKS LLC
  • US7843826B2 patent drawing
  • US7843826B2 patent drawing
  • US7843826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A technique for ensuring that a node that carries high-priority protocol data units and low-priority protocol data units is properly configured to accord the high-level protocol data units priority treatment is described. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, two streams of protocol data units are transmitted through a node to be tested. One stream comprises high-priority protocol data units, and the second stream comprises low-priority protocol data units. The processing capabilities of the node are then burdened by increasing the frequency of protocol data units transmitted to it, so that the node is compelled to treat the two streams differently, if, in fact, it is properly configured to treat them differently. If the node treats the two streams differently and accords the high-priority stream higher priority, then the node is properly configured. Otherwise, the node is re-configured to accord the high-priority stream higher priority.