Telecommunications Server Risk Assessment for E-Commerce Fraud

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective methods to identify irregular electronic commerce transactions, particularly in card-not-present scenarios, which can lead to fraud, and do not adequately utilize telecommunications network data to assess risk levels for processing fees.

Innovation Solution

A telecommunications server analyzes user data, including location and payment history, to assign risk levels to electronic commerce transactions, which are then used by transaction processors to influence processing fees, thereby reducing fraud by verifying identity and detecting deviations in communication patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional transaction processing systems are used without telecommunications network data integration, then system complexity remains low, but fraud detection capability and reliability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the telecommunications network data system with the electronic commerce transaction processing system. The server queries the telecommunications network for user data (location, payment history, communication patterns) and integrates this with transaction data to perform comprehensive risk assessment. This combination enables enhanced fraud detection by correlating multiple data sources without requiring completely separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The server performs multiple functions: processing electronic commerce transactions, querying telecommunications network data, analyzing user behavior patterns, assigning risk levels, and determining processing fees. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate specialized systems into a single unified platform, improving reliability while managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive user data analysis is performed to assign accurate risk levels, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but data processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk level assignment accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and analysis by maintaining user profiles with historical communication data, location information, and payment patterns in the telecommunications network. When a transaction occurs, the server queries this pre-organized data rather than collecting and analyzing raw data in real-time, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining accurate risk assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The server analyzes multiple parameters including location data, payment history, communication patterns, and device information to assign risk levels. By changing and evaluating multiple parameters simultaneously rather than relying on single-factor assessment, the system achieves higher precision in risk level assignment while using automated algorithms to keep processing time acceptable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If risk-based processing fees are implemented, then fraud prevention effectiveness increases, but transaction cost and user burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud prevention effectivenessVSAvoidtransaction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The server assigns different risk levels (first, second, third levels) to different transactions based on specific user behavior patterns and transaction characteristics. Processing fees are adjusted locally for each transaction based on its assigned risk level, rather than applying a uniform fee structure. This allows the system to charge higher fees only for suspicious transactions while keeping fees low or zero for legitimate transactions, maintaining fraud prevention effectiveness while minimizing overall cost burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10354251B1Assigning risk levels to electronic commerce transactions
Publication Date: 2019.07.16 T MOBILE INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US10354251B1 patent drawing
  • US10354251B1 patent drawing
  • US10354251B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and computer readable media for identifying irregular electronic commerce transactions are provided. A server is configured to receive a request for a risk level associated with electronic commerce transactions. The sever accesses a communications account associated with a user who initiated the electronic commerce transaction. The user may initiate the electronic commerce transaction on a wireless device. The server accesses the communication patterns, payment patterns, and voice patterns of the communications account for the wireless device. If changes in the communication, payment, or voice patterns of wireless device are detected, the server assigns a high or medium risk level to the electronic commerce transaction. If the server is unable to identify the pattern change, the assigned risk level of the electronic commerce transaction is low. The assigned risk levels are received by a transaction processor and may influence a rate charged for processing the electronic commerce transaction.