Telecom Switching Matrix with Remote Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current telecommunications networks face high costs and inefficiencies in managing physical copper wiring connections, particularly when new services are added or existing services are changed, due to the need for manual field engineer visits and the waste of resources from over-provisioning full non-blocking functionality in cross bar and Clos networks.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus comprising a first and second distribution matrix connected to a crossover matrix, allowing for remote control of switching elements to manage connections within the matrices, reducing the need for manual field engineer visits and minimizing resource waste by using recursive matrix cycles and simple 2×2 switching elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a cross bar or Clos network is used for automated connections, then the need for manual field engineer visits is reduced, but the initial purchase cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated connectionsVSAvoidinitial purchase cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The switching system is divided into multiple 2×2 switching elements arranged in a distributed matrix configuration rather than using a single large cross bar or Clos network. This segmentation allows automated switching functionality to be achieved through many simple, inexpensive units working together, reducing the initial purchase cost while maintaining automation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses numerous inexpensive 2×2 switching elements instead of expensive cross bar or Clos network components. These simple switching elements can be easily replaced and configured, providing cost-effective automated switching without requiring large initial investment in complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Adaptability or versatility

If full non-blocking functionality is provisioned in cross bar and Clos networks, then connection flexibility is maximized, but resource waste occurs since 90-95% of connections remain unchanged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection flexibilityVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of provisioning full non-blocking functionality across the entire network, the patent implements partial reconfiguration capability using simple 2×2 switching elements. The system provides just enough switching flexibility to handle the 5-10% of connections that need to be changed, avoiding the resource waste associated with over-provisioning full non-blocking capability for all connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies switching functionality locally at each 2×2 switching element rather than globally across the entire network. Each switching element can be independently configured to handle local connection changes, providing adaptability where needed while minimizing overall resource consumption and avoiding waste in areas where connections remain unchanged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If the number of cross bars is increased to handle more connections, then connection capacity increases, but the cost increases due to the square relationship between cross bars and cross points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection capacityVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the switching function into multiple 2×2 elements that can be scaled linearly to increase connection capacity. Instead of requiring a quadratic increase in cross points as with cross bar networks, the segmented approach allows capacity expansion by simply adding more inexpensive switching elements in a distributed configuration, avoiding the cost escalation associated with increasing cross bar size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8503668B2Provision of telecommunication services
Publication Date: 2013.08.06 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US8503668B2 patent drawing
  • US8503668B2 patent drawing
  • US8503668B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus (100), network and a method for switching-in and switching-off telecommunications or data services in a telecommunications or data network to a plurality of subscribers (102, 120, 122), the apparatus (100) comprising a first distribution matrix (104) connected to a crossover matrix (108) and a second distribution matrix (106) connected to said crossover matrix (108), wherein the crossover matrix (108) is adapted to be connected to a main cable (110) and to a distribution cable (112) and crossover switching elements for switching of connections within said crossover matrix (108) and distribution switching elements for switching of connections within said distribution matrices (104, 106) are controlled from a remote location, wherein the first distribution matrix (104) and the second distribution matrix (106) are adapted to be connected to a node for providing plurality of telecommunications or data services (114).