Telecommunication Dependency Graph Validation Against Network Traffic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing telecommunication service dependencies rely on manual processes, lack a central registry, and fail to account for environmental changes, leading to errors, incomplete information, and increased risk of service failures.

Innovation Solution

A central platform for registering and tracking telecommunication service dependencies, which compares declared dependencies to actual dependencies identified through network traffic analysis, and triggers actions such as notifications or failovers based on discrepancies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manual processes are used for managing telecommunication service dependencies, then flexibility and ease of implementation are maintained, but errors and incomplete information increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidaccuracy of dependency information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically discovers and manages service dependencies by instrumenting services to self-report their dependencies. Services automatically register their dependencies with the dependency graph data structure, eliminating manual configuration and reducing human error while maintaining ease of implementation through automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of dependency tracking with automated computational systems. The dependency graph data structure and automated service instrumentation substitute for manual configuration processes, improving accuracy while maintaining ease of implementation through code-based rather than manual management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If a central registry for tracking dependencies is implemented, then completeness and accuracy of dependency information improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of dependency informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The dependency graph data structure serves multiple functions: it tracks dependencies, enables impact analysis, supports service discovery, and facilitates automated testing. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems while maintaining information completeness, thereby managing complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The dependency graph acts as an intermediary data structure that mediates between services and the management system. Services simply register their dependencies with the graph, and the graph handles all complex queries and analyses, isolating complexity within a single manageable component rather than distributing it across multiple systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If automated dependency tracking is implemented, then accuracy and reliability of service evaluation improve, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of service evaluationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously maintaining an up-to-date dependency graph as services are deployed and modified. This pre-computed dependency information is immediately available for impact analysis and service evaluation, eliminating the need for time-consuming analysis at the moment of change while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where services automatically report their dependencies to the dependency graph, and the graph provides immediate feedback for impact analysis. This continuous feedback loop maintains accurate dependency information without requiring periodic full-system scans, reducing processing time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If environmental changes are not accounted for in dependency management, then system simplicity is maintained, but service failures increase due to drift from documented dependencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of dependency managementVSAvoidservice stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The dependency graph is designed to be dynamic, automatically updating as services are deployed, modified, or removed in different environments. The system adapts to environmental changes by continuously tracking actual service dependencies rather than relying on static documentation, maintaining simplicity through automated adaptation while ensuring service stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12375947B2Evaluating telecommunication services based on dependencies systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 T MOBILE US INC
  • US12375947B2 patent drawing
  • US12375947B2 patent drawing
  • US12375947B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for managing dependencies for telecommunication services, such as software applications, are disclosed. To evaluate a telecommunication service comprising a software application, a set of declared dependencies are accessed for the service. The declared dependencies include services upon which the telecommunication service depends. Actual dependencies are identified for the telecommunication service, such as by analyzing operations performed by the telecommunication service based on network traffic between the telecommunication service and one or more other services. The telecommunication service is evaluated by comparing the actual dependencies to the declared dependencies. For example, the system can evaluate whether actual dependencies are consistent with dependencies specified in an architecture or design for the telecommunication service.