Telematics Crash Detection Using Predicted vs Observed Vehicle Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle safety systems are limited in detecting crash events, relying on specific sensor detections and failing to identify a wide range of crash types, leading to incomplete crash data and potential false positives.

Innovation Solution

A crash prediction system that uses telematics data to predict vehicle responses based on control inputs and dynamics, comparing predicted responses with observed responses to identify anomalies indicative of crashes, and validating through additional sensor data analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If specific sensor thresholds are used for crash detection, then the detection system is simple to implement, but it fails to identify a wide range of crash types leading to incomplete crash data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash detection coverageVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the crash detection process into multiple independent analysis components: telematics data analysis, sensor data analysis, machine learning model evaluation, and rule-based validation. Each segment handles specific aspects of crash detection, allowing the system to cover diverse crash types while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a universal crash detection framework that handles multiple crash types (frontal, side, rear, rollover, pedestrian impacts) through a single multi-functional platform. The machine learning models and sensor fusion techniques provide universal detection capabilities across various crash scenarios, eliminating the need for separate detection systems for each crash type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple sensors and complex analysis are used to improve crash detection accuracy, then crash identification reliability improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrash identification reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where machine learning models continuously learn from crash data and sensor inputs, refining their predictions. The rule-based validation provides feedback loops that verify machine learning outputs and adjust detection parameters, improving reliability while managing complexity through iterative optimization rather than static complex rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components including machine learning models that mediate between raw sensor data and crash detection decisions, and rule-based validation layers that act as intermediaries to verify predictions. These intermediaries simplify the overall system architecture by breaking down complex detection logic into manageable processing stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If traditional sensor-based detection is used, then the system responds quickly to impact events, but it produces false positives and cannot detect all crash types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcrash detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of telematics data and sensor inputs before final crash determination. Machine learning models pre-process and evaluate crash likelihood in advance, and rule-based systems pre-validate sensor readings, enabling rapid real-time detection without sacrificing accuracy through preliminary filtering and prediction stages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11827237B2Systems and methods for real-time crash detection using telematics data
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 TOYOTA CONNECTED NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US11827237B2 patent drawing
  • US11827237B2 patent drawing
  • US11827237B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and other embodiments described herein relate to improving crash prediction through correlating an observed response and a predicted response of a vehicle. In one embodiment, a method includes generating the predicted response for the vehicle as a function of a response model and according to current vehicle inputs that are control inputs associated with steering, braking, and accelerating the vehicle. The response model is a learning model that predicts behaviors of the vehicle. The method includes computing a residual indicating an extent of correlation between the predicted response and the observed response. The method includes, in response to determining the residual satisfies a crash threshold that indicates an anomaly between the predicted response and the observed response, providing an alert indicating the vehicle has likely crashed.