Tele-Operated Robot Navigation Using UAV Top-View Obstacle Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tele-operated robots for outdoor property maintenance, such as lawn care and landscaping, face challenges in navigating complex environments and efficiently utilizing human oversight to handle unforeseen situations, leading to inefficiencies and increased labor costs.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a tele-operated robot, a control center, and an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that collaboratively navigate and operate to minimize labor hours and total time spent on property maintenance by classifying navigable and non-navigable areas, estimating alternate paths, and deploying human oversight when necessary, using sensors and aerial imagery for obstacle avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tele-operated robots are used for outdoor property maintenance, then labor hours and total time can be minimized, but the robots face challenges in navigating complex environments and handling unforeseen situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabor hours and total timeVSAvoidnavigation capability in complex environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the property into navigable and non-navigable areas using aerial imagery, allowing the robot to autonomously operate in suitable zones while human operators handle complex areas, thereby resolving the contradiction between productivity improvement and navigation capability limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Aerial imagery serves as an intermediary that provides the robot with advance knowledge of the environment, enabling it to plan paths and avoid obstacles autonomously, thus improving navigation capability without sacrificing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the robot autonomously navigates without human oversight, then operational efficiency increases, but the robot cannot effectively handle unforeseen situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidhandling of unforeseen situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial automation where the robot autonomously handles routine navigation and maintenance tasks to maximize operational efficiency, while human operators provide oversight specifically for unforeseen situations, achieving both productivity and reliability goals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensors and aerial imagery to continuously monitor the environment, enabling the robot to detect unforeseen situations and switch from autonomous to tele-operated mode, thus maintaining reliability without compromising operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the robot follows a fixed operating path, then navigation simplicity increases, but the robot cannot avoid obstacles effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation simplicityVSAvoidobstacle avoidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The operating path is made dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the robot to autonomously adjust its trajectory based on real-time obstacle detection while maintaining simple navigation logic, thus resolving the contradiction between navigation simplicity and obstacle avoidance capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260099824A1System, devices and methods for tele-operated robotics
Publication Date: 2026.04.09 ELECTRIC SHEEP ROBOTICS INC
  • US20260099824A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099824A1 patent drawing
  • US20260099824A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot includes an optical marker disposed to be visible in a top-view image of the robot, a receiver configured to receive a top-down image of an area of interest surrounding the robot within a property, and a processor configured to distinguish the robot from structural features on the property based on an image of the optical marker. A position and an orientation of the robot and the structural features relative to the property is determined based on the top-down image. Among the structural features, a subset of features classified as obstacles inhibiting an operation of the robot as the robot moves within the area of interest is determined. An operating path for the robot within the area of interest so as to avoid the obstacles is then determined.