Teleoperation System for Autonomous Vehicle Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) face challenges in handling system faults, extreme weather conditions, and temporary detours, which can lead to risks such as collisions or traffic jams, and existing technologies lack effective remote assistance mechanisms to intervene and ensure safe operation.

Innovation Solution

A teleoperation system that allows a remote operator to interact with an AV system by determining the need for intervention, analyzing vehicle status and environment signals, and enabling fallback interventions such as changing driving modes or generating new trajectories, using machine learning and pattern recognition to assess malfunctions or unknown objects, and prioritizing interventions based on decision trees or past data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If autonomous driving capabilities are implemented without remote intervention mechanisms, then automation level is improved, but reliability deteriorates when system faults or unexpected events occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous driving capabilityVSAvoidsafe operation under system faults
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A teleoperation system acts as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle and remote operators. The system includes a teleoperation client in the vehicle and a teleoperation server that can communicate with operators, enabling human intervention when the autonomous system encounters faults or unexpected situations, thus resolving the contradiction between high automation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If remote teleoperation system is added to handle events, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe operation with remote assistanceVSAvoidteleoperation system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The teleoperation client and server are designed to handle multiple types of events and interventions through a unified architecture. The system can manage various communication protocols, handle different event types (system faults, extreme weather, temporary detours), and support multiple intervention modes, reducing overall system complexity through multi-functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If teleoperation intervention is implemented, then ability to handle unexpected events is improved, but loss of time occurs during operator response

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to unexpected eventsVSAvoidoperator response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The teleoperation system establishes communication channels and prepares intervention protocols in advance. The client and server are pre-configured to handle various event types, and operators can be alerted and prepared for intervention before critical situations arise, reducing response time when unexpected events occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10317899B2Intervention in operation of a vehicle having autonomous driving capabilities
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US10317899B2 patent drawing
  • US10317899B2 patent drawing
  • US10317899B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Among other things, a determination is made that intervention in an operation of one or more autonomous driving capabilities of a vehicle is appropriate. Based on the determination, a person is enabled to provide information for an intervention. The intervention is caused in the operation of the one or more autonomous driving capabilities of the vehicle.