Surgical Teleoperation Master Control for Separate Grip and Force Commands

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing master control devices for robotic surgery lack intuitive and precise control over the opening and closing of slave surgical instruments, often resulting in unwanted commands due to inconsistent geometric relationships between sensors, particularly in unconstrained systems, leading to delays and involuntary actuations.

Innovation Solution

A master control device with two tracking sensors that detect geometric variations along different directions to separately control the opening/closing and gripping force of a slave surgical instrument, using a single movement trajectory to distinguish between these actions, minimizing sensor usage and ensuring precise control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single movement trajectory is used to control both opening/closing and gripping force, then device complexity is reduced, but control precision deteriorates due to inability to differentiate between the two functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of sensorsVSAvoidcontrol differentiation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control functions by assigning different sensor types to different functions: optical sensors track the master device position and orientation for opening/closing control, while force sensors detect gripping force modulation. This segmentation allows precise differentiation of the two functions while keeping the overall device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension of control by introducing force sensing capability alongside position tracking. The force sensor measures the third dimension (force magnitude) while optical sensors provide positional information in three spatial dimensions, creating a multi-dimensional control space that clearly distinguishes between opening/closing commands and gripping force modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If unconstrained flying master device is used, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to unwanted commands from inconsistent geometric relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaster device maneuverabilityVSAvoidcommand accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where force sensors continuously monitor the gripping force and provide real-time information to the control system. This feedback allows the system to distinguish between intentional force modulation and unintentional movements, correcting for geometric inconsistencies and preventing unwanted commands while maintaining the freedom of movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical constraints with sensor-based detection and software-based control. Instead of using mechanical linkages to enforce geometric relationships, the system uses optical sensors and force sensors to detect the master device state and software algorithms to interpret commands, eliminating the reliability issues associated with mechanical geometric constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensors are used to detect geometric relationships, then control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric relationship detection precisionVSAvoidsensor quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using different types of sensors in different locations for different purposes: optical sensors are positioned on the master device to track position and orientation, while force sensors are positioned at the gripping interface to detect force magnitude. Each sensor type is optimized for its specific local function, achieving high measurement precision without requiring multiple sensors of the same type throughout the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4598472B1Master control device for surgical teleoperation, system for teleoperation and control method for simulations
Publication Date: 2026.03.25 MEDICAL MICROINSTRUMENTS INC
  • EP4598472B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2
  • EP4598472B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4598472B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5A

AI summary

A robotic system (100) for medical or surgical teleoperation, comprising a master control device (110) for controlling at least the degree of freedom of opening/closing (GR) of the slave surgical instrument (170) with a first tracking sensor (31) and a second tracking sensor (32), in which the system further comprises at least one control unit (104), configured to detect a first variation of the geometric relationship between the first tracking sensor (31) and the second tracking sensor (32) of the master control device (110) along a first direction (X1), based on the first variation of the detected geometric relationship, move a slave surgical instrument (170) to open/close; detect a second variation of the geometric relationship between the first tracking sensor (31) and the second tracking sensor (32) of the master control device (110) along a second direction (X2), based on the second variation of the detected geometric relationship, vary the closing/gripping/cutting force of the enslaved slave surgical instrument (170).