Teleoperator Location Verification for Remote Vehicle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous vehicle systems lack sufficient location-dependent verification of teleoperators for remote vehicle control, posing safety risks and potential legal issues due to unverified geographic locations and jurisdictions.

Innovation Solution

A method for location-dependent verification of teleoperators involves the vehicle receiving a response message from the teleoperator, ascertaining network-dependent properties, determining target values based on the vehicle's location, and verifying the teleoperator through a test condition. If authorized, the teleoperator can continue remote control; otherwise, the vehicle terminates the control and sends a safety warning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If remote control of a vehicle is enabled to allow operator assistance in complex traffic situations, then the vehicle's ability to handle difficult driving scenarios is improved, but safety risks and unauthorized access become possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle complex traffic situationsVSAvoidsafety of remote control operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of the teleoperator's location and network properties before allowing remote control. The vehicle checks whether the teleoperator is in an authorized location and whether network-dependent properties match expected values, preventing unauthorized access before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors network-dependent properties of communication between the vehicle and teleoperator, and provides feedback by verifying these properties against expected values. This ongoing verification ensures that the remote control connection remains secure and authorized throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If remote control from any location is permitted to provide flexible operator assistance, then the ease of operation is improved, but the risk of unauthorized access and legal violations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of teleoperator locationVSAvoidunauthorized access and legal violations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different verification requirements based on the teleoperator's location. Instead of treating all locations equally, the system determines authorized locations in advance and applies location-specific verification, allowing flexible remote operation only from approved places while blocking unauthorized access from other locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-determines which locations are authorized for teleoperation and stores this information. Before allowing remote control, the system checks whether the teleoperator's current location matches one of the pre-approved locations, preventing unauthorized access while maintaining operational flexibility from legitimate sites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If location verification is implemented to prevent unauthorized remote control, then the safety and security are improved, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of remote controlVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses network-dependent properties as an intermediary verification mechanism. Rather than directly complex location checking, the system verifies properties of the network communication itself (such as latency, packet characteristics, or routing information) that inherently reflect the teleoperator's location, simplifying the verification process while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification system leverages existing network infrastructure and communication protocols to perform location verification. The network itself provides the verification data through its inherent properties, eliminating the need for separate complex verification hardware or systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12326726B2Method for location-dependent verification of a teleoperator for remote control of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12326726B2 patent drawing
  • US12326726B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for location-dependent verification of a teleoperator for remote control of a vehicle. At its current location, the vehicle repeatedly and automatedly performs the following: receiving, from the teleoperator, during remote control by the teleoperator, a response message requested via a network, ascertaining a current value of at least one network-dependent property of the received response message, determining a target value of the at least one network-dependent property, verifying the teleoperator by means of a verification of the current value of the at least one network-dependent property and of the determined target value based on a test condition, wherein in the case of a positive test result of the check, the teleoperator is authorized to perform the remote control of the vehicle, and in the case of a negative test result of the check, the vehicle terminates the remote control and/or sends a safety warning.