Telescoped Control Rod for Pebble-Bed Reactor Shutdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing modular pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor relies on complex and operationally challenging absorption sphere shutdown systems, which complicate reactivity control and increase the risk of accidents, especially when only a control rod system is used for cold shutdown.

Innovation Solution

A telescoped control rod system comprising an inner and outer rod with a guide cylinder assembly, allowing for extended reach within the reactor core without altering the pressure vessel height, and incorporating multi-section structures with shock absorbers and articulated joints for improved reliability and ease of operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a control rod system is used for cold shutdown, then reactivity control is enhanced, but the control rod requires huge driving force to overcome resistance of stacked spherical fuel elements causing damage to fuel elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactivity controlVSAvoiddamage to fuel elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control rod is divided into multiple sections (first control rod section, second control rod section, etc.) that can move independently. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function and reduces the overall driving force required compared to a single long control rod, while maintaining effective reactivity control throughout the reactor core.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control rod sections are arranged in a nested configuration where inner control rod sections are positioned within outer control rod sections. This nested structure allows the control rod to achieve extended reach into the reactor core without increasing the external dimensions, reducing the driving force required while maintaining full reactivity control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If the length of absorber of each control rod is increased to cover entire reactor core, then reactivity control is improved, but the height of reactor pressure vessel must be increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactivity controlVSAvoidheight of reactor pressure vessel
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The nested arrangement of control rod sections allows the absorber length to extend throughout the entire reactor core height while the external dimensions of the control rod assembly remain compact. This enables full reactivity control coverage without increasing the reactor pressure vessel height.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The control rod sections are designed to move dynamically and independently, allowing the absorber length to be effectively extended into the reactor core without requiring a proportional increase in the stationary pressure vessel height. The dynamic movement enables full core coverage with compact external dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If absorption sphere shutdown system is used, then cold shutdown is achieved, but system complexity increases and operation difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecold shutdownVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control rod system is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides reactivity control during operation and also achieves cold shutdown when needed. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for a separate absorption sphere shutdown system, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining both reactivity control and cold shutdown capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control rod system merges the functions of reactivity control and shutdown into a single integrated system. By combining these functions, the patent eliminates the need for separate absorption sphere shutdown system components, thereby reducing system complexity and operational difficulty while maintaining reliable cold shutdown capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If control rod system is simplified to reduce complexity, then ease of operation is improved, but reactivity control capability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreactivity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control rod is segmented into multiple independent sections that can be controlled separately. This segmentation maintains fine-grained reactivity control capability while simplifying the overall system architecture and operation compared to a single complex control rod system, as each section can be independently adjusted for precise reactivity management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10229759B2Reactivity control method and telescoped control rod for pebble-bed high-temperature gas-cooled reactor
Publication Date: 2019.03.12 TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY
  • US10229759B2 patent drawing
  • US10229759B2 patent drawing
  • US10229759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reactor lateral reflection layer telescoped control rod capable of separately achieving cold shutdown includes an inner rod, an outer rod and a guide cylinder assembly which are vertically and coaxially arranged, wherein the outer rod and the guide cylinder assembly are hollow cylindrical bodies; the top end of the inner rod can move up and down inside the outer rod and the other end of the inner rod moves up and down, along with the top end, inside a control rod passage which is positioned below the guide cylinder assembly and is coaxial with the guide cylinder assembly; and the top end of the outer rod can move up and down in the guide cylinder assembly and the other end of the outer rod moves up and down, along with the top end, inside the control rod passage.