Telescopic Window Fitting With Extension Rail

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fitting arrangements for windows and doors face challenges in adapting to various sash sizes without high costs, material wastage, and limited flexibility, especially with telescopic fittings that can be cumbersome and asymmetrically actuated.

Innovation Solution

A telescopic fitting arrangement featuring a gear rod and locking rod with an extension rail that can be coupled for increased length, an end cover for secure installation, and a coupling mechanism allowing for adjustable and robust configuration, ensuring compatibility with conventional components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If telescopic fittings are used to adapt to different sash sizes, then versatility is improved, but the maximum length change is limited and accessibility problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to sash sizesVSAvoidmaximum length change
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fitting arrangement is divided into modular components: a base telescopic fitting assembly and detachable extension rails. The extension rails can be coupled to the locking rod to increase the overall length, allowing the system to adapt to larger sash dimensions while maintaining the compact base design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The extension rail is designed to be coupled to the locking rod in a nested configuration, where the extension rail attaches to the functional section of the locking rod. This nesting approach allows the extension rail to extend the reach of the fitting without adding excessive bulk or complexity to the base structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Adaptability or versatility

If telescopic fittings are extended to reach inaccessible ends, then coverage is improved, but the minimum length remains too great causing protrusion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of sash endsVSAvoidminimum length
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The fitting arrangement incorporates a telescopic mechanism that allows dynamic adjustment of the locking rod length. The gear rod and locking rod can slide relative to each other, enabling the fitting to be compact when retracted and extended when needed, thus avoiding protrusion while maintaining coverage capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The separation of the base fitting assembly from the optional extension rail allows the system to be installed in a compact configuration for small sashes, while the extension rail can be added only when larger sashes require additional reach. This segmentation eliminates the need for the minimum length problem to affect all applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If drive rod is manufactured oversize and cut to size, then adaptability is improved, but labor and material waste increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to sash sizesVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The extension rail is designed as a universal component that can be coupled to the locking rod to provide additional length. Rather than manufacturing custom-length drive rods for each application, the same standard-length locking rod can be combined with extension rails as needed, eliminating material waste while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The overall length of the fitting arrangement is adjusted by changing the configuration rather than the base component dimensions. The locking rod maintains a standard length, and the extension rail provides the additional length parameter when required, avoiding the need to manufacture oversize components and cut them to fit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If end cover is added to cover free end sections, then robustness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of fitting assemblyVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end cover is integrated with the extension rail assembly, serving both as a protective cover for the free end section and as part of the structural connection system. The end cover is coupled to the faceplate rail, merging the protective function with the mounting structure rather than adding a completely separate component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP2602412B1Fitting device
Publication Date: 2020.07.01 MACO TECHNOLOGIE GMBH
  • EP2602412B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP2602412B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP2602412B1 patent drawingFigure 7

AI summary

The arrangement (10) has a transmission rod and a locking bolt (12) displaceable or decoupled relative to each other, and coupled to one another in a driven manner in a mounted state. The bolt comprises a functional section at an end facing away from the transmission rod, where the functional section comprises functional elements for coupling with an additional component or a frame. An extension rail (14) comprises a functional section functionally formed as the functional section of the bolt such that the bolt is coupled with the extension rail by a safety device i.e. cover strip. The functional elements consist of a locking pin (16), a rod end (18), oblong holes (20, 20') and holes (22, 22').