Telescopic Riser Sluicer for Nuclear Tank Cleaning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cleaning systems for nuclear waste storage tanks lack the reach to effectively clean entire tanks, are inefficient, and suffer from end effector failures and limited functionality, leading to high operational costs and environmental exposure.

Innovation Solution

A large riser extended reach sluicer system with a telescopic mast and tool changer capability, allowing for adjustable reach, multiple end effector functions, and a failsafe mechanism to prevent accidental separation, enabling efficient cleaning and sample collection while reducing waste left in the tank.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a longer arm cleaning system is used to reach the entire tank, then the cleaning coverage is improved, but the installation becomes impossible in tanks with high waste depth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning coverageVSAvoidinstallation feasibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system is divided into multiple segments: a fixed base unit in the riser and a telescopic boom arm that can extend and retract. This segmentation allows the system to achieve extended reach without requiring a single excessively long arm, enabling installation in tanks with high waste depth while maintaining full cleaning coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The boom arm incorporates telescopic capability with extendable sections that can dynamically adjust its length. This dynamic structure allows the system to adapt its reach based on waste depth and tank configuration, solving the contradiction between needing long reach for full coverage and maintaining installability in various tank conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Area of stationary object

If multiple machines are placed around the tank perimeter to clean the entire tank, then the cleaning coverage is improved, but the operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning coverageVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning system is designed as a universal platform that can clean the entire tank from a single riser location. The telescopic boom and rotatable end effector enable one machine to perform the work of multiple machines, reducing operational costs while maintaining full cleaning coverage through centralized operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple cleaning functions and capabilities are merged into a single integrated system. The combination of telescopic extension, rotation, and interchangeable end effectors allows one machine to consolidate the functionality of multiple perimeter-mounted machines, achieving full tank coverage with reduced operational complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If the end effector is designed for single functionality, then the device complexity is reduced, but the adaptability to different waste types and operations is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend effector designVSAvoidfunctional capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector is designed as a universal interface that can accommodate multiple different tool heads and functional attachments. This multi-functional design allows a single base unit to perform various operations such as cutting, grinding, sampling, and cleaning by simply changing the end effector attachment, thereby increasing adaptability without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The end effector system incorporates quick-change mechanisms that allow dynamic reconfiguration of functional capabilities. Operators can rapidly swap between different end effectors based on the specific waste type or operation required, enabling the system to adapt to varying conditions while maintaining relatively simple individual component designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If the end effector is positioned closest to the waste for optimal cleaning, then the cleaning effectiveness is improved, but the reliability decreases due to premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning effectivenessVSAvoidend effector durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the end effector from the main machine body, making it a distinct, replaceable component. This segmentation allows the end effector to be quickly replaced when it fails or becomes worn, minimizing downtime and maintaining cleaning effectiveness without compromising overall system reliability. The main boom and control systems remain protected and functional.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11577287B1Large riser extended reach sluicer and tool changer
Publication Date: 2023.02.14 AGI ENGINEERING INC
  • US11577287B1 patent drawing
  • US11577287B1 patent drawing
  • US11577287B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Extended reach sluicer systems, devices, and methods for breaking up and retrieving chemical, radioactive, hazardous materials and/or other waste and/or other material from storage tanks with mechanical arms and nozzles to break up and transfer tank material. And this invention can work with tanks having high temperature or low temperature conditions.