Telescoping Interspinous Fixation Device for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal implants, particularly those for fusion, require invasive surgical procedures and long recovery times due to the need for rigid hardware and extensive tissue manipulation, limiting the effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques.

Innovation Solution

A telescoping spinous process fusion plate with a compact insertion state and expandable configuration, featuring adjustable extensions and fasteners, allows for percutaneous implantation and tissue ingrowth, facilitating less invasive surgery and promoting vertebral fusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional rigid spinal fusion hardware is used, then vertebral stabilization is achieved, but surgical invasiveness increases and recovery time extends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebral stabilizationVSAvoidsurgical invasiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The fusion plate is divided into multiple segments or modular components that can be assembled in a compact configuration for minimally invasive insertion, then expanded or configured to the final stabilization structure within the body, reducing surgical trauma while maintaining stabilization reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant components are designed to nest within each other in a compact state for percutaneous delivery through small incisions, then deployed to their functional configuration inside the interspinous space, enabling minimally invasive access to deep spinal structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If extensive tissue manipulation is performed for implant placement, then secure fixation is achieved, but tissue trauma increases and recovery is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefixation securityVSAvoidtissue trauma
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The implant design incorporates self-aligning features and self-retaining mechanisms that reduce the need for extensive manual tissue manipulation and complex fixation procedures, allowing the device to secure itself with minimal surgical intervention and tissue disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The implant provides localized fixation at specific attachment points rather than requiring broad tissue manipulation across the entire surgical site, concentrating the stabilization function at key interfaces while minimizing overall tissue trauma

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If compact implant design is used, then minimally invasive implantation is enabled, but expansion to functional size requires additional complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplantation minimally invasive capabilityVSAvoidexpandable mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The implant transitions from a static compact delivery configuration to a dynamic expanded functional configuration through a controlled mechanism that can be actuated during or after implantation, allowing the device to adapt its size and shape to the surgical site requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If rigid spacers and fusion hardware are implanted, then vertebral spacing is restored, but surgical complexity and recovery time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertebral spacing restorationVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The implant utilizes material property changes or structural transformations after implantation (such as bone ingrowth through porous structures or gradual integration with surrounding tissue) that enable spacing restoration while reducing the need for prolonged recovery and rehabilitation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2800532B1Telescoping interspinous fixation device
Publication Date: 2019.12.11 LANX INC
  • EP2800532B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2800532B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2800532B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

The present invention provides spinous process implants and associated methods. In one aspect of the invention, the implant includes at least one extension with a first part and a second part where at least one arm is coupled to each of the first part and the second part. The first part and the second part are movable from a compact to a distracted state. In another aspect, the present invention provides a second extension that is slidingly coupled to the first and second arms. The second extension further comprises a third part and a fourth part that move with the first and second part.