TEM In-Situ Testing of 1D Materials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current TEM electromechanical in-situ testing methods for one-dimensional materials primarily focus on tensile stress, making it difficult to conduct compression, buckling, and bending experiments without causing damage or pollution, which limits the observation of mechanical and electrical properties.

Innovation Solution

A multi-function sample stage is designed and manufactured using a boron-doped P-type silicon substrate processed through etching and laser stealth cutting, allowing for compression, buckling, and bending experiments, with samples fixed using conductive silver epoxy and observed under the TEM for real-time microstructure and electrical property changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If FIB welding is used to fix samples for TEM electromechanical in-situ testing, then samples can be secured for tensile stress testing, but sample damage and Pt pollution occur during the welding process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample fixation reliabilityVSAvoidsample damage and Pt pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the harmful FIB welding process entirely, replacing it with a mechanical fixation method using a specially designed sample stage with clamps that hold samples without causing damage or pollution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces an intermediary mechanical fixation structure (sample stage with clamps) that mediates between the sample and the TEM testing system, providing secure fixation without the harmful effects of FIB welding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Volume of moving object

If traditional TEM sample preparation is used, then sample thickness can be reduced for microstructure observation, but sample size in other dimensions becomes insufficient for force bearing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample thicknessVSAvoidforce bearing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the sample structure into two functional parts: a thin active region for microstructure observation and a thicker fixation region for force bearing, allowing each part to optimize its dimensions for its specific function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a third dimension (depth/thickness in the fixation region) to compensate for the reduced dimensions in the observation plane, allowing samples to be thin enough for TEM observation while maintaining sufficient size for mechanical testing through the sample stage structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing sample stages are used for TEM testing, then tensile stress testing is possible, but compression, buckling and bending experiments cannot be conducted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting mode limitationVSAvoidsample stage structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention designs a universal sample stage structure with adjustable clamps and loading mechanisms that can perform multiple testing modes (tension, compression, buckling, bending) on the same platform, eliminating the need for separate specialized stages for each test type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables real-time observation of microstructural and electrical property changes during stress processes, facilitating comprehensive TEM electromechanical in-situ testing of one-dimensional materials without damage or pollution, thereby improving the understanding of deformation and fracture mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

processed through the laser stealth cutting method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser stealth cutting: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

processed through etching

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Implementation Method 3

The samples are fixed with conductive silver epoxy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 4

TEM electromechanical in-situ testing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTEM imaging: Electron Beam

Data Source

PatentUS11313774B2TEM electromechanical in-situ testing method of one-dimensional materials
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 DALIAN UNIV OF TECH
  • US11313774B2 patent drawing
  • US11313774B2 patent drawing
  • US11313774B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A TEM electromechanical in-situ testing method of one-dimensional materials is provided. A multi-function sample stage which can compress, buckle and bend samples is designed and manufactured. A carbon film on a TEM grid of Cu is eliminated, and the TEM grid of Cu is cut in half through the center of the circle. The samples are dispersed ultrasonically in alcohol and dropped on the edge of the semicircular grid of Cu with a pipette. A single sample is fixed on the edge of a substrate of the sample stage with conductive silver epoxy by using a micromechanical device under an optical microscope, and conductive silver paint is applied to the surface of the substrate of the sample stage; and an electromechanical in-situ testing is conducted in a TEM. This provides a simple and efficient sample preparation and testing method for a TEM electromechanical in-situ observing experiment.