Template Engine Configuration Chaining for Consistent App Setup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Custom configuration of software installation on PCs is complicated due to numerous individually configurable parameters, redundancy, and inconsistencies in answer files, leading to user errors and security vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A configuration file chaining system and method that merges configuration settings from different namespace scopes into a few answer files, using a template engine to generate customized configurations for information handling systems, ensuring consistency and reducing redundancy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If numerous individually configurable parameters are provided for application customization, then adaptability and versatility are improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication customization capabilityVSAvoidconfiguration system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The configuration system is segmented into multiple answer files with hierarchical scopes (system-wide, application-specific, user-specific). Each answer file contains a subset of configuration parameters organized by scope, allowing the system to manage complexity through division while maintaining comprehensive customization capability through the combination of segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of organization by adding hierarchical scopes (system, application, user) to the configuration parameter space. This transforms the flat, complex parameter list into a multi-dimensional structure where parameters are accessed and managed through multiple levels, reducing apparent complexity while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If numerous individually configurable parameters are provided for application customization, then adaptability and versatility are improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to user errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication customization capabilityVSAvoidconfiguration process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically generating answer files from templates and merging configuration data before the user needs to use them. Configuration parameters are pre-validated and organized into the correct hierarchical structure in advance, eliminating the need for users to manually handle complex parameter combinations and reducing operational errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces answer files as intermediary artifacts between the configuration system and the application installation process. These answer files serve as validated, consolidated configuration specifications that mediate between the complex parameter space and the simplified user interaction, ensuring consistency and reducing errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of substance

If configuration parameters are merged from different namespace scopes, then redundancy is reduced, but measurement precision and consistency requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration redundancyVSAvoidconfiguration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Configuration parameters are segmented into distinct hierarchical scopes (system, application, user) with clearly defined boundaries and responsibilities. This segmentation eliminates redundancy by ensuring each parameter is defined at the most appropriate scope level, while the hierarchical structure automatically maintains consistency through scope-based validation rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different namespace scopes are assigned different local qualities and validation rules appropriate to their level. System-level parameters have different consistency requirements than user-level parameters, allowing the system to enforce precision at each level without imposing unnecessary constraints elsewhere, thereby reducing overall redundancy while maintaining necessary consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260023923A1Template engine system and method for configuring applications on an information handling system
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 DELL PROD LP
  • US20260023923A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023923A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023923A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a template engine that configures the applications and services in an IHS (e.g., computing device) using parameters that have different namespace scopes or organizational origins. According to one embodiment, the template engine is stored in a memory and executed by a processor to receive a data structure associated with an application, wherein the data structure comprises at least one custom parameter for the application, generate an answer file using the template file, and using the answer file, custom configure the application on a target computing device.