Temporal Input Encoding for Intent-Aware Generative Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generative models like large language models (LLMs) fail to consider the temporal characteristics of user input, leading to responses that may be over or under specified, failing to appropriately guide conversations based on user intent.

Innovation Solution

A generative model processes both the content and temporal encoding of user input, using supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning with human feedback to generate responses tailored to user intent, indicated by input events such as typing or speaking speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If generative models process only content of user input without temporal characteristics, then the model structure remains simple and processing is fast, but the response accuracy and appropriateness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidmodel structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces temporal encoding as an additional dimension to the traditional content-based input representation. By adding temporal characteristics (typing speed, pauses, delays) as a separate encoding layer that is concatenated with content embeddings, the system enhances response accuracy without fundamentally restructuring the model architecture, thus resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs temporal encoding as an intermediary component that bridges the gap between raw input events and model processing. This intermediary layer captures temporal patterns from input events (such as time between keystrokes) and transforms them into a format that can be integrated with content embeddings, enabling improved response accuracy while maintaining model simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If generative models ignore temporal characteristics of user input, then processing speed remains high and computational resources are minimized, but the ability to guide conversation appropriately deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidconversation guidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the input processing into two independent parts: content processing and temporal processing. The content is processed through standard tokenization and embedding, while temporal characteristics are processed separately through temporal encoding. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, maintaining processing speed while adding conversation guidance capability through temporal information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the temporal encoding with content embeddings by concatenating the two encoding vectors to form a combined embedding that is then processed by the generative model. This merging approach integrates temporal information into the existing processing pipeline without creating separate processing streams, thus maintaining high processing speed while enhancing conversation guidance capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Quantity of substance

If generative models provide comprehensive factual information regardless of user input characteristics, then information completeness is maximized, but the response becomes over-specified and hard to digest

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation quantityVSAvoidresponse digestibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of information quantity dynamically based on temporal encoding characteristics. When temporal encoding indicates slow typing speed or pauses (suggesting user uncertainty or need for clarity), the model adjusts the amount of factual information provided. This parameter change enables the system to provide comprehensive information when needed while avoiding over-specification when the user appears confident, thus improving response digestibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250342321A1Processing, using generative model, content of user input and temporal encoding for the user input
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250342321A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342321A1 patent drawing
  • US20250342321A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations relate to generating, using a generative model (e.g., an LLM), generative model output that reflects a response that is responsive to content of user input and that is responsive to temporal characteristic(s) of providing the user input (e.g., typing speed(s)). Input event(s) that are performed by a user in providing the user input are determined, and temporal features associated with the user input are extracted from the determined input event(s). The generative model is trained to process a combined representation of a content embedding determined from content of the user input and a temporal encoding that encodes the temporal features associated with the user input, in order to generate the response. The generated response thus includes content that varies even when two queries having the same word content are received, if input events for the two queries indicate different user intents.