Temporal Neural Network Prediction for Future Ranging Observations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in predicting future sensory observations to create optimized trajectories and avoid collisions, especially in dynamic traffic situations, due to the complexity of the problems handled by existing autonomous driving algorithms.

Innovation Solution

A method using a temporal neural network that processes sequences of previous sensory observations and control actions to generate predicted future sensory observations, enhancing environmental perception and obstacle detection for improved path planning and collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing autonomous driving algorithms are used to predict future sensory observations, then the vehicle can navigate and avoid obstacles, but the computational complexity and difficulty of the problem increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidance capabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction problem is segmented into multiple sub-problems by dividing the sensory observations into different modalities (e.g., camera images, lidar point clouds, radar data) and processing them through separate neural network branches before fusion. This segmentation reduces the computational complexity of handling the entire sensory input at once while maintaining reliable collision avoidance predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary processing of sensory observations by pre-computing feature representations and predicting potential obstacle trajectories in advance before the actual navigation decision is required. This preliminary action reduces the real-time computational burden and improves the reliability of collision avoidance by having predictions ready beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If deep learning models are employed to handle complex autonomous driving problems, then prediction accuracy improves, but the training time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The deep learning model is segmented into multiple specialized sub-networks, each trained on specific aspects of sensory data (e.g., object detection, trajectory prediction, depth estimation). This segmentation allows parallel training of smaller models that converge faster while achieving higher overall prediction accuracy through their coordinated outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs partial training strategies where not all model parameters are updated in every training iteration. Instead, only relevant subsets of parameters are trained based on the current loss landscape and data sample, reducing training time while maintaining or improving prediction accuracy through focused learning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the vehicle considers all threats in the surrounding environment to produce a collision-free route, then safety is improved, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by focusing computational resources on predicting and analyzing threats in critical local regions around the vehicle (e.g., direct path, intersection areas) rather than uniformly processing all environmental threats. This prioritization maintains safety for high-risk scenarios while reducing processing time for less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification and filtering of potential threats from the environment before detailed analysis. By pre-screening sensory data to identify only those objects and situations that pose actual collision risks, the system reduces the number of threats requiring full processing while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20210383202A1Prediction of future sensory observations of a distance ranging device
Publication Date: 2021.12.09 ELEKTROBIT AUTOMOTIVE GMBH
  • US20210383202A1 patent drawing
  • US20210383202A1 patent drawing
  • US20210383202A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving controller predicts future sensory observations of a distance ranging device of an autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicle having such an autonomous driving controller. In a first step, a sequence of previous sensory observations and a sequence of control actions are received. The sequence of previous sensory observations and the sequence of control actions are then processed with a temporal neural network to generate a sequence of predicted future sensory observations. Finally, the sequence of predicted future sensory observations is output for further use.