3D Object Detection for Tennis Ball Bounce Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for determining whether a tennis ball has bounced within or outside a game area, such as a tennis court, face challenges including high costs, complexity, inefficiency, and inaccuracies due to reliance on simulated image analysis or two-dimensional detection methods, which fail to accurately differentiate the ball from other objects and shadows.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a three-dimensional object detection and recognition system that acquires a sequence of images, performs approximate detection, automatically selects images of the impact point, and analyzes them to determine if a spherical element has bounced on a perimeter line or target, employing high-speed cameras and laser scanners to provide precise, real-image analysis without simulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If simulated image analysis is used to determine ball bounce location, then detection precision can be improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses real captured images instead of simulated images to represent the ball's position and trajectory. By directly capturing and analyzing actual images of the ball during flight, the system eliminates the need for complex trajectory simulation while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential visual information needed for bounce determination from the captured images, focusing on key moments (ball release, bounce, landing) rather than processing complete simulated trajectories. This reduces computational complexity while preserving detection precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If multiple high-speed cameras are deployed to capture ball trajectory, then detection precision improves, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the detection process into discrete key moments (ball release, bounce, landing) rather than requiring continuous trajectory capture. By focusing on these critical instants, the system can use fewer cameras strategically positioned to capture these specific moments, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-identifies and captures images at predetermined key moments in the ball's flight path. By knowing in advance what moments are critical for bounce determination, the system can optimize camera positioning and timing to capture only these essential frames, reducing the number of cameras needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If real-time image analysis is performed to determine bounce location, then productivity improves, but measurement precision may decrease due to processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary capture of images at all key moments continuously, storing them for later analysis. This allows real-time detection because the critical images are already captured and ready for immediate analysis when needed, eliminating processing delays while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different analysis methods to different key moments based on their specific characteristics. For example, bounce detection uses specific image features and comparison methods optimized for that particular moment, improving both speed and accuracy of the analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of time

If automated detection system is implemented, then loss of time is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for bounce determinationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses simple image capture and comparison techniques rather than complex automated tracking algorithms. By directly comparing captured images of the ball's position with known court boundaries and key moment templates, the system achieves rapid automated determination without requiring sophisticated complex detection hardware or software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9953424B2Method and system for determining whether a spherical element impacts with a component of a playing field, or arranged on or proximate thereto
Publication Date: 2018.04.24 FOXTENN BGREEN
  • US9953424B2 patent drawing
  • US9953424B2 patent drawing
  • US9953424B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for determining whether a spherical element impacts with a component of a playing field, or arranged on or proximate thereto. The method includes acquiring images of a surveillance area of a field that covers at least part of said component, such as a delimiting perimeter line of a game area or a target, performing an approximate detection of an impact of a spherical element relative to that component or proximate thereto, with an object detection and recognition system that can discern when the detected object is indeed a spherical element, automatically selecting one of the images acquired for the same point in time and that includes the area where said impact has occurred, and analysing the selected image to check if the spherical element has impacted or not with the component.