Tension-Line Spool Damping for Directional Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional damping systems for structures, such as rocket support towers and aircraft components, are often too large and bulky, imposing unwanted loads and failing to efficiently manage dynamic deflections and vibrations within spatial constraints.

Innovation Solution

A damping system utilizing a spool and a flexible line that exhibits rigidity in tension and flexibility in compression, coupled with a rotational speed damper and a slack-line prevention device, which applies tension only when needed to damp unwanted movements by engaging and disengaging the damper based on the line's tension and compression states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional springs and dampers are used to control unwanted movement, then the damping function is achieved, but the system becomes large and bulky, imposing unwanted loads and failing to meet spatial constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping functionVSAvoidsystem size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical springs and dampers with a tension element system consisting of a spool, line, and damper assembly. This substitution maintains the damping function while significantly reducing system volume and weight, as the tension element system is inherently more compact and lightweight compared to traditional spring-damper configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and properties of the damping system by using a line that exhibits rigidity in tension and flexibility in compression. This parameter change allows the system to provide damping only when needed (during tensile loading) while remaining compact and not imposing unwanted loads during compressive phases, thus resolving the contradiction between damping effectiveness and system size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If conventional dampers are used, then vibration control is achieved, but unwanted loads are imposed on the structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration controlVSAvoidunwanted loads
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic engagement mechanism where the damper is selectively engaged only when the line is in tension and unwanted vibrations occur. The spool rotates to engage or disengage the damper based on the direction of motion, ensuring that damping forces are applied only when beneficial and unwanted loads are avoided during other phases of structural movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic engagement of the damping function through the rotational mechanism of the spool. As the structure undergoes cyclic vibrations, the spool rotates back and forth, periodically engaging and disengaging the damper to provide damping forces only during the tensile phases of vibration, thereby controlling vibrations while minimizing unwanted load imposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Power

If a damper is continuously engaged, then maximum damping force is applied, but the system becomes more complex and larger in size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping forceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a preliminary engagement mechanism where the damper is pre-positioned on the spool but only becomes actively engaged when the line tension causes the spool to rotate into the engagement position. This preliminary arrangement allows the system to maintain simplicity while enabling full damping force application only when structurally necessary, avoiding the complexity of continuously engaged damping systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively dampens vibrations in a spatially efficient manner, using lightweight tension elements and minimizing attachment requirements, while applying a tension-activated damping force only in the direction of unwanted movement, thus optimizing structural stability and reducing bulk.

Implementation Method 1

A damper is coupled to the spool for engagement with the spool to slow a rotational speed thereof when the spool rotates in a first direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

A damper is coupled to the spool for engagement with the spool to slow a rotational speed thereof

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscous damping: Viscous Damping

Implementation Method 3

The line is one that exhibits rigidity in tension and flexibility in compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11078984B1Structure movement damping system using tension element
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR NAT AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION
  • US11078984B1 patent drawing
  • US11078984B1 patent drawing
  • US11078984B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A damping system includes a spool about which a tension line is wound. The line's first end is coupled to a first structure subject to forces causing unwanted movement thereof. A damper is coupled to a second structure not subject to the unwanted movement of the first structure. The damper is coupled to the spool for engagement with the spool to slow a rotational speed thereof when the spool rotates in a first direction. The damper is disengaged from the spool when the spool rotates in a second direction in opposition to the first direction. A device, coupled to the line's second end and to the second structure, applies a tension force to the line's second end. The tension force is exceeded when the first structure moves to place the line in tension, and is not exceeded when the first structure moves to place the line in compression.