Tensor Network Design Synthesis for Multi-Constraint Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Design optimization tools struggle to map the unique interactions between design variables, operational constraints, and performance objectives, leading to inefficiencies in decision-making processes.

Innovation Solution

Employing tensor networks, rooted in statistical physics, to model state relationships within multidimensional data structures, providing a holistic understanding of design tools and their output objectives, constraints, and optimality conditions through tensor network contractions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional design optimization tools are used, then basic optimization functions can be performed, but the ability to map unique interactions between design variables, operational constraints, and performance objectives is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinteraction mapping capabilityVSAvoidtool complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces tensor networks as an intermediary mathematical framework that mediates between design variables, constraints, and objectives. The tensor network decomposition represents complex interactions through a series of interconnected tensors, each capturing specific relationship patterns. This intermediary structure enables systematic mapping of interactions without requiring direct complex computations between all variables simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the complex optimization problem into multiple manageable components through tensor decomposition. Each tensor in the network represents a specific interaction pattern or relationship type, allowing the system to process and analyze interactions in discrete, manageable segments rather than as a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Loss of information

If comprehensive analysis of multiple constraints and interactions is performed, then deeper insights into the optimization landscape are obtained, but computational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsight completenessVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary decomposition of the optimization problem into tensor network components before executing the full optimization analysis. By pre-establishing the tensor network structure with appropriate decomposition, the system prepares the computational framework in advance, enabling more efficient execution of subsequent analysis while maintaining comprehensive coverage of interactions and constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic contraction strategies where the tensor network can be adaptively evaluated based on specific query requirements. The network structure remains comprehensive for capturing all interactions, but the contraction process can dynamically focus computational resources on specific regions or relationships of interest, balancing completeness with efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250363186A1Tensor Network Systems For Design Synthesis And Optimization Tools
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US20250363186A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363186A1 patent drawing
  • US20250363186A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example computer system includes memory hardware configured to store computer-executable instructions, and a design tool model. The system includes processor hardware configured to execute the computer-executable instructions to obtain multiple input parameters each associated with the design tool model, obtain multiple output objectives each associated with the design tool model, build at least one tensor network between the multiple input parameters and the multiple output objectives, the at least one tensor network including one or more tensors each connected between at least one of the multiple input parameters and at least one of the multiple output objectives, and perform one or more contractions of the at least one tensor network to generate a contraction result, the contraction result indicative of an effect of at least one of the multiple input parameters on at least one of the multiple output objectives.