Terminal Access Control Barring State Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In communication systems, when a remote terminal performs cell or relay reselection and remains in the same cell or relay, the access control barring state is not effectively managed, leading to potential network congestion.

Innovation Solution

An access control method where a terminal determines whether to stop its access control barring state based on the selection results of cell selection, cell reselection, relay reselection, or relay selection, thereby controlling network access and alleviating congestion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the terminal continues access attempts in the same cell or relay during access control barring state, then the terminal can maintain connection continuity, but network congestion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection continuityVSAvoidnetwork congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the access control barring state based on cell reselection and relay reselection events. When the terminal reselects to a different cell or relay, the access control barring state is cleared, allowing new access attempts. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the access control behavior to the current network environment, maintaining connection continuity when appropriate while preventing congestion through state clearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the terminal monitors cell reselection and relay reselection outcomes. Based on this feedback, the terminal determines whether to clear or maintain the access control barring state. This feedback loop ensures that access control decisions are based on actual network conditions, resolving the contradiction between maintaining connections and preventing congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the terminal clears access control barring state after reselection, then network access is improved, but unnecessary access attempts may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork access efficiencyVSAvoidunnecessary access attempts
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating the access control behavior based on the specific reselection outcome. The access control barring state is cleared only when reselection to a different cell or relay occurs, not in all cases. This localized application of state clearing improves network access efficiency when beneficial while avoiding unnecessary access attempts when not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically determines whether to clear the access control barring state based on the actual reselection outcome. The system adapts its behavior to the specific situation, clearing the state only when appropriate (different cell/relay reselection) and maintaining it when inappropriate (same cell/relay reselection). This dynamic approach optimizes network access efficiency while minimizing unnecessary access attempts and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250039754A1Access control method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE CO LTD
  • US20250039754A1 patent drawing
  • US20250039754A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An access control method, performed by a terminal, includes: determining that a terminal is in an access control barring state, and determining, according to a selection result of a cell selection, a cell reselection, a relay reselection or a relay selection, whether to stop the access control barring state.