Wireless Terminal De-prioritization Cancellation Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication systems, particularly in 3GPP LTE, terminal mobility leads to degraded service quality due to network-deployed de-prioritization of frequencies and Radio Access Technologies (RATs, resulting in inefficient cell reselection and limited network optimization efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that allow terminals to apply and cancel de-prioritization based on network commands, adjusting frequency and RAT priorities dynamically to improve service quality and radio resource efficiency by handling de-prioritization cancellation commands and maintaining adaptive priority handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the network provides de-prioritization information to limit terminal mobility, then network optimization efficiency is improved, but service quality provided to the terminal deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork optimization efficiencyVSAvoidservice quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic priority handling by introducing a de-prioritization timer that automatically expires after a predetermined period. This allows the terminal to transition from a static de-prioritized state to a dynamic state where priorities can be reassessed and updated, enabling the terminal to access cells that may have improved service quality over time while maintaining network optimization goals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic action through the de-prioritization timer mechanism that resets or expires at predetermined intervals. This periodic refresh allows the terminal to periodically re-evaluate cell priorities and potentially access cells that were previously de-prioritized, thereby improving service quality while the network maintains overall optimization efficiency through controlled periodic updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If the terminal operates based on existing network information, then access to cells providing excellent service is cut-off, but network side access limitation efficiency is maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidnetwork optimization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having the terminal proactively handle de-prioritization cancellation before the de-prioritization timer expires. The terminal can determine based on measured cell priorities whether to cancel de-prioritization early, allowing access to cells that have become suitable for service while maintaining network optimization by only canceling when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the terminal measures cell priorities and compares them against de-prioritization settings. This feedback loop allows the terminal to make informed decisions about whether to cancel de-prioritization, ensuring that service quality is improved only when actual cell conditions warrant such changes, thereby maintaining network optimization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If de-prioritization is applied to frequencies in the de-prioritization frequency list, then terminal movement limitation is achieved, but adaptive priority handling is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility control efficiencyVSAvoidpriority handling adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the de-prioritization mechanism dynamic by introducing timer-based expiration and cancellation capabilities. Instead of static frequency prioritization, the system now allows priorities to change over time and in response to network conditions, enhancing adaptability while maintaining mobility control through the structured timer and cancellation command mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables parameter changes by allowing de-prioritization settings to be modified through cancellation commands and timer expiration. The priority parameters for frequencies can be dynamically adjusted based on network conditions and terminal measurements, transforming the rigid de-prioritization approach into a flexible adaptive system that maintains control while improving responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2950585B1Priority handling-based operation method in wireless communication system and apparatus supporting same
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP2950585B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2950585B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2950585B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An operation method performed by a terminal in a wireless communication system is provided. The method includes: applying de-prioritization to one or more frequencies in a de-prioritization frequency list; receiving a de-prioritization cancellation command from a network; and handling the applied de-prioritization on the basis of the de-prioritization cancellation command.