Terminal Group Mobility Geolocation for Lower Calibration Burden

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing geolocation methods for wireless communication systems, particularly in large areas, suffer from accuracy issues and complexity due to the need for extensive calibration and reliance on radio signatures, which are influenced by noise and require significant computing resources.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes the mobility patterns of terminals within a wireless communication system to group terminals that have moved together, using autonomously measured sensor data to improve geolocation accuracy by correlating the positions of terminals within these groups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning-based geolocation methods using radio signatures are used, then geolocation accuracy can be improved, but the complexity of the system and computing resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources (radio signatures, sensor data from accelerometers, gyroscopes, barometers, and GPS) into a unified geolocation framework. By merging these diverse inputs and processing them through a single machine learning model, the system achieves higher accuracy while avoiding the complexity of multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model serves multiple functions: it processes radio signatures, sensor data, and GPS information; it performs both calibration and geolocation tasks; and it adapts to different environmental conditions. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If extensive calibration phases with many measurement points are conducted, then geolocation accuracy improves, but the time and cost of the calibration phase increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs calibration in advance by collecting radio signatures and sensor data at multiple locations before actual geolocation operations begin. This preliminary calibration phase creates a database that can be reused for subsequent geolocation tasks, avoiding repeated calibration efforts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses sensor data and radio signatures collected during calibration as templates or copies that represent specific locations and conditions. During operation, the system compares current measurements against these stored copies to determine geolocation, eliminating the need for real-time recalibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If a large number of base stations and measurement points are included in the database, then geolocation accuracy improves, but the computing capacity and time requirements increase considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeolocation accuracyVSAvoidcomputing capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and uses only the most relevant features from the collected data, such as key sensor measurements and radio signature characteristics. By extracting essential information rather than processing all raw data, the system maintains accuracy while reducing computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model transforms raw sensor data and radio signatures into optimized parameter representations that are more efficient to process. By changing the parameter space and using dimensionality reduction techniques, the system handles large datasets with reduced computing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If conventional geolocation methods using base station signals are used, then the system is simpler to implement, but geolocation accuracy deteriorates due to large base station coverage areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidgeolocation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the geolocation problem into multiple components: radio signature analysis, sensor data processing, and pattern matching. By dividing the task into smaller segments handled by different modules, the system achieves high accuracy without requiring a completely complex monolithic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3769105B1Method and system for geolocation of group-evolving terminals
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 UNABIZ SAS
  • EP3769105B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3769105B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3769105B1 patent drawingFigure 4~7

AI summary

The invention concerns a method for estimating the geographical position of a terminal (70i) of interest, among a panel of terminals (70) of a wireless communication system (60), comprising: - determining (52), for each terminal of said panel, a time signature comprising values measured for said terminal during a predetermined observation period, - calculating (54) values of similarity between the time signatures of the terminals of the panel, a similarity value calculated for two terminals representing the probability of said terminals being moved together or having been located at the same place during said observation period, - partitioning (56) various terminals of the panel into different groups depending on the similarity values, - estimating (44) the geographical position of the terminal of interest as a function of the available geolocation data for at least one other terminal of the group to which the terminal of interest belongs.