Terminal Mobility Status Estimation for Wireless Network Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobility status estimation methods in wireless telecommunications systems are prone to inaccuracies, particularly for stationary or near-stationary terminal devices, leading to suboptimal configuration settings and inefficient resource management.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where terminal devices determine and report their mobility status along with an associated reliability indicator to the base station, allowing for more accurate configuration adjustments based on the device's mobility and reliability assessment, using methods such as cell reselection counting or fixed location detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mobility status estimation is performed using conventional methods (cell reselection counting), then mobility status can be determined, but measurement precision deteriorates for stationary or near-stationary terminal devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility status estimation accuracyVSAvoidconfiguration optimization reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters used for mobility status estimation by introducing multiple alternative methods (GPS-based location change detection, signal strength-based cell quality comparison, cell reselection counting) with different characteristics. Each method has different sensitivity to stationary conditions, and the system can select or combine them based on the terminal device type and scenario, thereby improving measurement precision without sacrificing reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the terminal device reports mobility status estimates to the base station, and the base station uses this information to optimize configuration parameters. The system continuously monitors and adjusts configurations based on reported mobility status, creating a closed-loop feedback system that improves both measurement precision and configuration reliability over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If configuration parameters are optimized based on inaccurate mobility status, then resource management efficiency deteriorates, but if conventional estimation methods are used, then measurement precision is insufficient for stationary devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork resource management efficiencyVSAvoidmobility status estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the configuration parameters dynamic by linking them to the estimated mobility status. The base station adjusts parameters such as handover thresholds, measurement frequencies, and power saving states based on the terminal device's mobility characteristics. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to optimize resource management efficiency for each device according to its actual mobility behavior, resolving the contradiction between productivity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different configuration strategies to different terminal devices based on their specific mobility characteristics. Instead of using uniform configuration parameters for all devices, the system tailors parameters locally to each device's mobility status, whether stationary, slow-moving, or fast-moving. This local quality approach enables precise resource management for each device type while maintaining overall network efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If multiple mobility status estimation methods are implemented, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility status determination accuracyVSAvoidterminal device processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mobility status estimation process into multiple independent methods that can be executed selectively. Each method (GPS-based, signal strength-based, cell reselection-based) operates as a separate module with its own logic. The terminal device can implement all methods but only needs to report the most reliable estimate, reducing processing complexity while maintaining high measurement precision through selective method execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows terminal devices to implement more mobility estimation methods than strictly necessary (excessive action), but the system only requires reporting of the most reliable estimate. This approach enables devices to have comprehensive estimation capabilities for future flexibility while keeping current operational complexity low by only processing and reporting the best available estimate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11974354B2Telecommunications apparatus and methods
Publication Date: 2024.04.30 SONY GROUP CORP
  • US11974354B2 patent drawing
  • US11974354B2 patent drawing
  • US11974354B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless telecommunication system comprises a base station and a terminal device (UE). The UE is configured to determine its mobility status and an associated reliability. The UE is configured to convey an indication of the mobility status and the reliability to the base station. The base station may then configure the UE for operation within the wireless telecommunications system in a manner that takes account of both the mobility status and the reliability for the mobility status. This can help optimise configuration settings for the UE which depend on device mobility.