Terminal Remittance Request Collective Processing Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic money management systems on terminals face inefficiencies in processing multiple unprocessed remittance requests, leading to inconvenience and potential insufficiency in user balances when handled individually.

Innovation Solution

A method for collective processing of remittance requests, including collective settlement, request cancellation, collective remittance request creation, and special collective remittance, which allows for simultaneous processing of multiple requests, ensuring transactions do not exceed user balances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If multiple remittance requests are processed individually, then each request can be handled with simple processing logic, but the user balance may become insufficient and additional funds are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing logic simplicityVSAvoiduser balance sufficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple remittance requests into a single collective processing operation. Instead of executing each request separately which depletes the user balance incrementally, the system aggregates all pending requests and processes them simultaneously, allowing the balance to be evaluated once against the total required amount and preventing insufficient balance errors during individual transactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary aggregation of multiple remittance requests before execution. By collecting and summing all pending remittance amounts in advance, the system can pre-validate whether the user has sufficient balance to cover the total, and can notify the user to deposit funds before any individual request is processed, avoiding runtime balance insufficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If multiple remittance requests are processed collectively, then user convenience is improved and balance insufficiency is reduced, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser convenienceVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the collective processing into distinct functional modules: a request collection module that gathers pending remittance requests, a aggregation module that sums the amounts, a validation module that checks balance sufficiency, and an execution module that processes all requests. This modular segmentation manages complexity by organizing the collective processing logic into discrete, manageable components with clear interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary aggregation layer between the individual remittance requests and the execution engine. This intermediary component accumulates requests, performs balance validation, and coordinates the collective execution, thereby managing the complexity of processing multiple requests simultaneously while presenting a simplified interface to users through a single collective operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If multiple remittance requests are handled individually, then the processing logic remains simple, but transaction efficiency decreases and user hassle increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing logic simplicityVSAvoidtransaction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual remittance requests into a single collective transaction batch. By processing all pending requests in one unified operation rather than sequentially executing each request, the system achieves significant productivity improvement through reduced processing overhead, single balance validation, and batch execution, while the modular architecture keeps the underlying logic manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20230138065A1Program, information processing method, and terminal
Publication Date: 2023.05.04 LY CORP
  • US20230138065A1 patent drawing
  • US20230138065A1 patent drawing
  • US20230138065A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing method may be performed by a terminal, and the method may include displaying, on a display of the terminal, at least a first display based on first information relating to a remittance request from a first user to a user of the terminal or a remittance request from a user of the terminal to the first user, and a second display based on second information relating to a remittance request from a second user to the user of the terminal or a remittance request from the user of the terminal to the second user, and performing, by a processor of the terminal, first processing based on the first information and the second information, based on input to the terminal on which the first display and the second display are displayed.