Conductor Terminal Spring Layout for Separated Connection Chambers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conductor connection terminals face challenges in achieving a compact structure and cost-effective production while efficiently utilizing installation space, as existing designs often result in electrical conductor interference due to shared connection spaces.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a separating section on the contact leg of the clamping spring divides the connection space into spatially separate conductor connection chambers, preventing conductor interference without the need for additional partition walls, allowing for variable numbers of connectable conductors and optimizing installation space through asymmetric component arrangements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a compact conductor connection terminal is designed with shared connection space, then installation space is reduced, but electrical conductor interference occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation spaceVSAvoidconductor connection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The contact leg of the clamping spring is divided into a clamping section and a separating section. The separating section extends in a direction deviating from the main extension direction of the contact leg, creating spatial separation between multiple conductor connection chambers. This segmentation allows multiple conductors to be connected in a compact terminal without interference, as each conductor has its own defined chamber while the overall terminal volume remains reduced.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If separate partition walls are used to divide conductor connection chambers, then conductor separation is achieved, but device complexity and production cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconductor separationVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The separating section is integrally formed with the contact leg of the clamping spring, merging the functions of electrical contact and chamber separation into a single component. This eliminates the need for separate partition walls or additional separating components, reducing device complexity and production cost while maintaining reliable conductor separation. The separating section serves dual purposes: electrical conduction and spatial division.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The contact leg is designed with multi-functionality, serving as both an electrical conductor and a chamber separator. The separating section of the contact leg performs the separation function that would traditionally require a dedicated partition wall, while the contact leg itself maintains its electrical contact function. This multi-functionality reduces the number of components and simplifies the overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the separating section extends in the main direction of the contact leg, then chamber separation is achieved, but clamping effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechamber separationVSAvoidclamping force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The separating section extends in a direction that deviates from the main extension direction of the contact leg, creating an asymmetric structure. This asymmetric design allows the separating section to provide effective chamber separation while the clamping section maintains optimal alignment for applying clamping force to the conductor. The directional deviation enables both separation and effective clamping without interference between these functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures reliable spatial separation of conductors, reduces installation space requirements, and prevents interference, while allowing for flexible conductor connections and efficient use of space, enhancing the overall performance and efficiency of the conductor connection terminal.

Implementation Method 1

a clamping spring (4a, 4b) having a clamping leg (5a, 5b) and a contact leg (6a, 6b), which are connected to one another via a spring arch (7a, 7b), wherein the clamping legs (5a, 5b) serve to press the respectively inserted electrical conductor (2a, 2b) against the busbar (3) with spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3849018B1Conductor connecting terminal
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 WAGO VERW GMBH
  • EP3849018B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3849018B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3849018B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A conductor terminal for connecting electrical conductors to a busbar, wherein the conductor terminal has an insulating housing with at least two conductor entry openings and a conductor connection space adjoining the conductor entry openings, a busbar and a clamping spring for a spring-loaded clamping connection, and wherein the clamping spring has a clamping leg and a contact leg connected to each other by a spring arc, characterized in that the clamping leg and/or the contact leg of the clamping spring has a separating section by means of which the conductor connection space can be divided into at least two spatially separated conductor connection chambers.