Terminal Scheduling Request Adjustment for Uplink Grant Latency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing data transmission methods in communication technologies result in significant service interruption and user experience degradation due to prolonged time consumption in requesting an uplink grant, often taking around 6 seconds to re-establish the service when the maximum number of scheduling request transmissions is reached without obtaining a grant.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where a terminal adjusts the maximum number of scheduling request (SR) and preamble transmissions based on the priority of data to be transmitted, allowing for a quicker re-request of the uplink grant resource, thereby reducing service interruption duration and improving user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the terminal transmits SR according to the maximum number of SR transmissions configured by the base station, then the terminal can request UL grant resource, but the service interruption time is prolonged to about 6 seconds

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUL grant acquisitionVSAvoidservice interruption time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal dynamically adjusts the maximum number of SR transmissions based on data priority. For high-priority data, the terminal reduces the maximum SR transmission count and initiates random access earlier, transforming the fixed configuration into a dynamic adaptation mechanism that resolves the contradiction between reliable grant acquisition and time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The terminal changes the parameter of maximum SR transmissions from a fixed network-configured value to a variable that depends on data priority. This parameter change enables the system to switch between different transmission strategies (standard SR vs. accelerated random access) based on service requirements, reducing service interruption time for high-priority data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If the terminal reduces the maximum number of SR transmissions to reduce service interruption time, then the time consumption decreases, but the terminal may fail to obtain UL grant resource

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice interruption timeVSAvoidUL grant acquisition
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal performs preliminary assessment of data priority before SR transmission. For high-priority data, the terminal pre-determines to use reduced SR transmissions and switch to random access, preparing the fallback mechanism in advance to ensure both time reduction and grant acquisition reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The terminal introduces data priority as an intermediary criterion that mediates between SR transmission persistence and random access switching. This intermediary enables intelligent decision-making that balances the contradiction between reducing service interruption time and ensuring UL grant acquisition success.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the terminal initiates random access request when SR transmissions reach maximum, then the terminal can re-request UL grant resource, but the overall time consumption is still about 6 seconds

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUL grant request flexibilityVSAvoidservice establishment latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal dynamically selects between SR-based grant request and random access-based grant request based on data priority. For high-priority data, the terminal accelerates the transition to random access, making the system adaptive to different service requirements and reducing service establishment latency while maintaining flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The terminal segments the UL grant request process into two distinct paths: standard SR transmission path for low-priority data and accelerated random access path for high-priority data. This segmentation allows the terminal to choose the appropriate path based on data priority, reducing overall time consumption while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20230422294A1Method for data transmission, terminal, and chip
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 UNISOC CHONGQING TECH CO LTD
  • US20230422294A1 patent drawing
  • US20230422294A1 patent drawing
  • US20230422294A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for data transmission, a terminal, and a chip are provided. The method for data transmission is performed by a terminal. The method for data transmission includes: receiving scheduling request (SR) configuration information transmitted by a base station (BS), where the SR configuration information contains a maximum number of SR transmissions; adjusting the maximum number of SR transmissions according to a priority of data to-be-transmitted; and transmitting an SR to request an uplink (UL) grant resource for transmission of the data to-be-transmitted, and initiating a random access request to re-request the UL grant resource in response to a number of SR transmissions reaching the maximum number of SR transmissions.