Terminal Verification via Machine Parameter Analysis
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing methods for detecting the authenticity of terminals, such as mobile phones, are unreliable due to system modifications, leading to potential misdetection and reduced accuracy when comparing configuration parameters.
Innovation Solution
A terminal verification method that reads machine verification parameters, determines if the system is modified by satisfying specific conditions involving model identification and system modification parameters from a preset library, and displays the verification result on a user interface.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If configuration parameters are obtained and compared with official parameters to detect terminal authenticity, then detection process is simple, but misdetection occurs when system is modified and reliability is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The verification process is divided into multiple independent condition checks (first condition, second condition, third condition) rather than a single comparison step. Each condition verifies different aspects: model identification, system modification parameter existence, and parameter consistency. This segmentation allows the system to maintain operational simplicity while improving reliability through multi-layered verification.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary identification of the terminal model and retrieves expected system modification parameters from a preset library before conducting the final authenticity verification. This preliminary action enables the system to prepare reference data in advance, making the detection process both simple to execute and reliable through pre-validated comparison criteria.
2Measurement precision
If system modification parameters are verified through multiple conditions including model identification and parameter consistency checks, then accuracy of terminal detection is improved, but verification complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The preset system modification parameter library serves multiple functions: it stores expected parameters for different terminal models, provides reference data for consistency checks, and enables verification across various terminal types through a unified approach. This multi-functionality allows the verification system to achieve high accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same library structure handles diverse verification scenarios.
Solution Approach 2:
The system verifies authenticity by checking whether actual system modification parameters match expected parameters retrieved from the library. This parameter-based verification approach allows the system to maintain accuracy through precise parameter comparison while managing complexity by using standardized parameter structures and automated matching algorithms rather than complex procedural checks.
Data Source
AI summary
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a terminal verification method, a terminal device and a computer readable storage medium. The method includes: reading machine verification parameters of a target terminal, determining that a system of the target terminal is modified in response to determining that the machine verification parameters of the target terminal satisfy a first condition, a second condition and a third condition, and displaying on a user interface of the target terminal that, the system of the target terminal is modified.