3D Sensor Terrain Data Oversampling for Landing Zone Roughness Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3D sensors used in synthetic vision systems for aircraft landing and taxiing have limited spatial resolution due to beam divergence and measurement inaccuracies, leading to oversimplification of terrain data and potential undetection of small obstacles, which can result in catastrophic collisions.

Innovation Solution

The method involves oversampling terrain data through multiple measurement cycles and statistical evaluation to classify local properties of the landing zone or taxi area, using higher-order statistical features like variance, skewness, and kurtosis to determine ground roughness and obstacle presence, which is then displayed as markers or color coding for improved safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If 3D sensors are used to survey the landing zone, then spatial information is obtained, but spatial resolution is insufficient due to beam divergence and measurement inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidobstacle detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary surveying of the landing zone before the critical landing phase, accumulating terrain data in advance. This allows the sensors to map the area when the aircraft is at a safer distance, avoiding the need for high-resolution measurements during the final approach when beam divergence is most problematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the surveying process by continuously updating terrain models as the aircraft approaches. Data from multiple measurement cycles are integrated and refined in real-time, allowing the system to adapt to changing measurement conditions and improve resolution where most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If terrain data is averaged or filtered to reduce noise, then ground surface representation becomes smoother, but small obstacles may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground surface representation qualityVSAvoidobstacle detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different processing qualities to different regions of the terrain data. Areas identified as potential landing zones receive more rigorous processing and higher scrutiny, while non-critical areas can be processed more aggressively for noise reduction. This localized approach preserves obstacle detection capability where it matters most.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs multiple measurement cycles and accumulates more data than the minimum required, using statistical evaluation to extract meaningful signals. By taking excessive measurements and applying sophisticated statistical analysis, the system can distinguish true obstacles from noise without requiring aggressive filtering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple measurement cycles are performed, then data accuracy improves through statistical evaluation, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain data accuracyVSAvoidsurvey time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple measurement cycles are performed in advance during the approach phase, accumulating terrain data before the critical landing decision must be made. This preliminary data gathering allows statistical evaluation to be completed with sufficient time margin, improving accuracy without delaying the landing sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The surveying process is integrated into the continuous approach sequence, with measurements taken throughout the descent rather than as separate discrete operations. This continuous data collection utilizes the entire approach trajectory, maximizing data quality without adding dedicated survey time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10281574B2Method for assessing a ground area for suitability as a landing zone or taxi area for aircraft
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH
  • US10281574B2 patent drawing
  • US10281574B2 patent drawing
  • US10281574B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for assessing a ground area for suitability as a landing zone or taxi area for aircraft is provided. Three-dimensional data for the ground area in a plurality of measurement cycles in a 3D sensor is produced. The measured-value density of the three-dimensional data and also of at least one further statistical property of the three-dimensional data is determined. A measure of the local roughness of the ground area is produced based on the measured-value density and the at least one further statistical property. The individual area elements of the ground area are classified on the basis of the roughness values produced according to the degree of suitability of said area elements as a landing area or taxi area.