Terry Fabric Differential Pick Density Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional woven terry fabrics have uniform pick density, leading to inefficient resource usage and higher weight, which results in increased laundry costs and reduced absorbency, making them less luxurious and less preferred in the hospitality industry.

Innovation Solution

A woven terry fabric with differential pick density, featuring zones with varying picks per centimeter, achieved through a three-pick terry weave construction that includes zones of lowest, highest, and intermediate pick densities, allowing for controlled weight distribution and reduced unit weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If uniform pick density is used throughout the fabric, then manufacturing is simplified, but weight and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidfabric weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying the pick density in different zones of the fabric. The central zone has higher pick density (20-30 picks/cm) for enhanced absorbency where it is most needed, while edge zones have lower pick density (10-20 picks/cm) to reduce weight. This localized differentiation resolves the contradiction by optimizing each region according to its functional requirements rather than applying uniform density throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The fabric is segmented into multiple zones with distinct pick density characteristics. The patent divides the fabric into a central zone and edge zones, each with different pick density ranges. This segmentation allows independent optimization of weight and absorbency properties in different regions, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and weight reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Weight of moving object

If picks per centimeter is reduced to lower weight, then resource consumption decreases, but absorbency and luxury feel deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric weightVSAvoidabsorbency
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by applying local quality through zone-specific pick density. The central zone maintains high pick density (20-30 picks/cm) to ensure adequate absorbency and luxury feel in the primary usage area, while edge zones use lower pick density (10-20 picks/cm) to reduce overall weight. This localized approach ensures absorbency is maintained where needed without unnecessarily increasing weight throughout the entire fabric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Quantity of substance

If higher picks per centimeter are used to increase absorbency, then luxury feel improves, but weight and laundry resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveabsorbencyVSAvoidfabric weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating higher pick density (20-30 picks/cm) in the central zone where absorbency is most critical, while using lower pick density (10-20 picks/cm) in edge zones. This resolves the contradiction by providing luxury feel and absorbency where needed without uniformly increasing weight across the entire fabric, thereby reducing overall resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Device complexity

If uniform pick density is used, then construction is simplified, but resource consumption for laundry increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction complexityVSAvoidlaundry resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing local quality through zone-specific pick density. The central zone uses higher pick density (20-30 picks/cm) for enhanced absorbency, while edge zones use lower pick density (10-20 picks/cm) to reduce weight and resource consumption. This differentiated construction, while slightly more complex than uniform density, significantly reduces laundry resource consumption by lowering overall fabric weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11982027B2Terry fabric with non-uniform/differential pick density and method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 DEVARAJ VIKRAM KRISHNA
  • US11982027B2 patent drawing
  • US11982027B2 patent drawing
  • US11982027B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention generally relates to the field of textiles. More particularly, it relates to A woven terry cloth with differential or non uniform pick density having different picks per centimeter and method for producing the same with controlled weight distribution. The terry fabric with differential pick density, having: a body comprising of one or more ends of first end (L1) and second end (L2), one or more edges of first side edge (W1) and second side edge (W2), and a plurality of zones (Z1, Z2, Z3); a plurality of ground warp ends (G1, G2); a plurality of terry pile loop yarn (P1, P2); and a plurality of ground fill picks (f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8). Additionally the woven terry cloth includes variable density of picks in different zones of the fabric.