Impact Reduction System Using Tesla Valves for PPE

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing personal protective equipment (PPE) such as helmets and shoes often rely on one-time use materials like expanded polystyrene foam or crumple zones that do not effectively distribute impact forces, leading to inadequate protection and inability to reset for repeated use.

Innovation Solution

A passive impact reduction system utilizing a closed fluid-based system with Tesla valves, where two bladder systems are connected by passageways with Tesla valves that resist fluid flow in both directions, allowing fluid to flow from one bladder to another upon impact and resetting by reversing the flow, thereby distributing impact forces over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional one-time use materials like expanded polystyrene foam or crumple zones are used, then the device structure is simple, but the protection effectiveness is insufficient and the device cannot be reset for repeated use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection effectivenessVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a hydraulic system using fluid-filled bladders connected by passageways. When impact occurs, the fluid flows from the impacted bladder through Tesla valves to the non-impacted bladder, distributing impact forces. This hydraulic approach replaces traditional foam materials and enables resettable protection while maintaining reasonable structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the physical state and distribution of fluid between bladders in response to impact. The fluid transitions from a static distribution to a dynamic redistribution pattern, allowing the system to adapt to impact events and then reset by reversing the flow direction through the Tesla valves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fluid flows freely between bladders, then the system can reset easily, but the impact force cannot be effectively distributed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force distributionVSAvoidreset capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Tesla valves serve as intermediary flow control elements in the passageways between bladders. These passive valves allow fluid to flow in the direction opposite to impact while resisting flow in the impact direction, enabling effective impact force distribution without preventing system reset through flow reversal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The fluid system is segmented into multiple bladders connected by controlled passageways. Each bladder can independently respond to impact while the segmented structure allows the fluid to distribute impact forces across multiple compartments, enhancing protection effectiveness while maintaining reset capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If active electronic control systems are used to manage fluid flow, then the control precision is high, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidelectronic control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses passive Tesla valves that automatically control fluid flow based on pressure differentials created by impact, without requiring electronic sensors, actuators, or control circuits. The valves self-regulate flow direction, eliminating the need for complex electronic control systems while maintaining adequate flow management for impact protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces the force of impacts by spreading momentum over a longer period, allowing for repeated use without the need for electronic control, providing enhanced protection compared to traditional PPE materials.

Implementation Method 1

a first series of Tesla valves that resist flow of the fluid from the first bladder system to a common point of the passageway when an impact occurs to the first bladder system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow resistance: Drag

Implementation Method 2

The system effectively reduces the force of impacts by spreading momentum over a longer period

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMomentum transfer: Conservation of Momentum

Data Source

PatentUS11930875B2Impact reduction system for personal protective devices
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 KASRAEI JOHN HOOMAN
  • US11930875B2 patent drawing
  • US11930875B2 patent drawing
  • US11930875B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Personal protective devices with an impact reduction system that includes a first bladder system including a fluid and a second bladder system are disclosed. A passage couples the first bladder system to the second bladder system and includes a first series of Tesla valves that resist flow of the fluid from the first bladder system to a common point of the passageway when an impact occurs to the first bladder system. In some embodiments, the passage further includes a second series of Tesla valves that resist flow of the fluid from the second bladder system to the common point of the passageway when an impact occurs to the second bladder system. The impact reduction system is a passive, closed system.