Test Apparatus Performance Inference via Line Parameter Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network operators face challenges in accurately measuring and ensuring the electrical parameters of access network lines meet regulatory standards, particularly in ensuring the performance of test equipment used for these measurements, due to the need for equivalent access for multiple communications providers.

Innovation Solution

A method involving attaching a test apparatus to a metallic loop, applying test signals, determining loop parameters, comparing them to threshold values, and storing data to assess the loop's status, with the performance of the test apparatus evaluated based on the ratio of acceptable to unacceptable results, using a Cone of Acceptability analysis to infer the condition of the transmission line.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If test apparatus is used to measure electrical parameters of access network lines, then network quality can be monitored and maintained, but the accuracy and reliability of measurements may be compromised due to equipment performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidtest apparatus performance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring test results and comparing them against expected performance thresholds. When measurements fall outside acceptable ranges, the system automatically triggers recalibration procedures, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains measurement accuracy over time despite equipment degradation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calibration and baseline measurements before actual network testing begins. This preliminary action establishes reference values and ensures the test apparatus is properly calibrated, preventing measurement errors before they occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If frequent recalibration of test apparatus is performed to maintain measurement accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity and operational efficiency deteriorate due to increased maintenance time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter measurement accuracyVSAvoidnetwork testing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of performing full recalibration procedures frequently, the system applies partial calibration actions only when and where needed. By monitoring test results and triggering recalibration only when thresholds are exceeded, the system performs minimal necessary calibration rather than excessive routine calibration, maintaining accuracy while preserving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The test apparatus automatically monitors its own performance and triggers self-calibration procedures when degradation is detected. This self-service capability eliminates the need for manual intervention and frequent scheduled maintenance, allowing the system to maintain accuracy autonomously while minimizing disruption to network testing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for reliable determination of the test apparatus's performance and the condition of network lines, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards by accurately measuring and storing data on line parameters, thereby maintaining network quality and reducing the need for frequent recalibration.

Implementation Method 1

The metallic loop parameters measured may be the insertion loss, the resistance of the metallic loop and the capacitance between the two wires which comprise the metallic loop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical Resistance: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

The metallic loop parameters measured may be the insertion loss, the resistance of the metallic loop and the capacitance between the two wires which comprise the metallic loop

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Data Source

PatentEP2710744B1Measurement method
Publication Date: 2020.05.20 BRITISH TELECOM PLC
  • EP2710744B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2710744B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2710744B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The performance of a test apparatus for a communications network may be inferred by analysing a set of performance data results measured on a number of different lines in the network. Once a sample of sufficient size for a particular test apparatus has been created then it is possible to infer the performance of the test apparatus based on the ratio of passes to fails recorded.