Test Assembly with Slot for Thermal Fatigue

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current thermal fatigue testing methods are inefficient in reliably inducing fatigue cracking in specimen assemblies, leading to prolonged testing and material screening processes.

Innovation Solution

A test specimen assembly is designed with a control element having a discontinuous profile and a slot, embedded within a test element made of potting material, subjected to a significant temperature differential to accelerate fatigue cracking, allowing for faster testing and analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional thermal fatigue testing methods are used with standard control elements, then the testing process is simple to implement, but fatigue cracking is not reliably induced leading to prolonged testing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of fatigue cracking inductionVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control element incorporates a slot that creates a localized stress concentration region. This slot is positioned at specific locations within the control element body to maximize stress concentration during thermal cycling, thereby reliably inducing fatigue cracking in the surrounding test element material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control element is pre-designed with an optimized geometry including a slot and specific dimensional ratios (length 15-40 times greater than thickness, slot extent 80%-120% of thickness) before testing begins. This preliminary design ensures that when thermal cycling is applied, fatigue cracking is reliably induced without requiring extended testing periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the control element has a simple continuous profile, then the manufacturing process is straightforward, but fatigue cracking is not accelerated effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidcontrol element geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control element features a slot that creates localized stress concentration zones. This geometric modification is concentrated at specific regions rather than throughout the entire element, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while dramatically improving fatigue cracking acceleration in the critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The control element geometry is optimized with specific parameter ranges: length 15-40 times greater than thickness, and slot extent 80%-120% of thickness. These parameter changes create the necessary stress concentration to accelerate fatigue cracking while maintaining a relatively simple overall form factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If a temperature differential of at least 100°C is applied, then fatigue cracking is accelerated, but the thermal stress on the specimen assembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting durationVSAvoidthermal stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The test specimen assembly utilizes differential thermal expansion between the control element (steel) and test element (potting material) to generate fatigue stress. By applying a temperature differential of at least 100°C, the assembly experiences repeated expansion and contraction cycles that accelerate fatigue cracking while the control element's geometry manages the resulting thermal stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #37Thermal expansion

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly accelerates fatigue cracking, enabling quicker material screening and durability analysis, with the test specimen assembly experiencing higher thermal strain and failure rates, thus saving time and resources.

Implementation Method 1

Based on the differences between the coefficients of thermal expansion between the control element and the test element, fatigue cracking is induced

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

cyclically subjecting the test specimen assembly to a first temperature and a second temperature for a period of time until the test specimen assembly experiences fatigue cracking. The first temperature and the second temperature can have a temperature differential. The temperature differential can be at least 100° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal shock: Thermal Shock

Data Source

PatentUS20240102904A1Test assembly and method of testing an assembly for thermal fatigue
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES AG & CO KG
  • US20240102904A1 patent drawing
  • US20240102904A1 patent drawing
  • US20240102904A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of testing a test specimen assembly is disclosed herein. The method can include providing the test specimen assembly which includes a control element and a test element, which are formed from different materials.