Automated Documentation Generation from Test Automate Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional documentation processes for software applications are inefficient and prone to inconsistencies, requiring manual updates and maintenance, leading to delays and customer confusion due to the separation of documentation and test automates, as well as issues with data accuracy and language consistency.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates documentation automatically from a test automate, allowing users to record their use of new functionality, parse the test automate to determine steps and actions, and populate a template with standardized data, reducing the need for manual updates and maintaining consistency across documents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual documentation processes are used, then documentation can be created with human judgment and flexibility, but inconsistencies and inefficiencies occur leading to delays and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation consistencyVSAvoiddocumentation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system copies test automate data and actions directly into documentation templates, eliminating manual transcription and ensuring consistency between test procedures and documentation. The documentation is generated as a copy of the actual test automate content, maintaining automatic synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The documentation system serves itself by automatically generating documentation from test automate data without requiring manual intervention. The system extracts necessary information from the test automate and populates documentation templates autonomously, reducing human error and improving consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If documentation and test automates are maintained separately, then each can be developed independently, but updates become redundant and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent developmentVSAvoidupdate time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges documentation generation with the test automate execution process. By integrating documentation creation into the test automate workflow, updates to test procedures automatically reflect in documentation without requiring separate maintenance efforts, eliminating redundant update cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by generating documentation templates in advance and automatically populating them with test automate data. This preliminary setup ensures that when test procedures change, the documentation is already structured to receive updates, reducing the time required for synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual documentation updates are performed, then changes can be reviewed and approved, but delays occur and customer confusion results from outdated information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoiddocumentation update speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by automatically detecting changes in test automates and triggering corresponding documentation updates. The feedback loop ensures that documentation remains synchronized with actual test procedures, providing accurate information to customers without manual review delays while maintaining version control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If standardized templates are used for documentation, then consistency across documents is improved, but flexibility in accommodating unique cases is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocumentation consistencyVSAvoidcustomization flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making documentation templates adaptable rather than rigid. The templates can dynamically adjust their content and structure based on the specific test automate data being processed, allowing standardized consistency while accommodating unique test scenarios through automatic configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11157271B2Documentation generation from test automate
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 SAP SE
  • US11157271B2 patent drawing
  • US11157271B2 patent drawing
  • US11157271B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for receiving a request for documentation related to functionality of an application, accessing a test automate generated from a recording of actions using the functionality of the application, and parsing the test automate to determine one or more steps in a process and, for each step in the process, a list of the actions for the step and corresponding data. The system and methods further provide for generating a file comprising the one or more steps and the list of actions and corresponding data for each step, determining a selected template for generating documentation for the functionality of the application and generating a populated template by populating one or more steps and corresponding list of actions in the selected template using the file comprising the one or more steps and the list of actions and corresponding data for each step.