Test Coupon Specification for Component Fatigue Life Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for predicting the fatigue life of components, particularly in additive manufacturing, face challenges in reproducing the exact material conditions due to production limitations and material responses, leading to inefficient and costly testing, and reliance on operator experience or unfeasible coupon selection.

Innovation Solution

A method combining finite element analysis with machine learning models to identify optimal test coupons by calculating their correlation to critical component conditions, reducing the need for physical testing and enhancing prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional coupon testing is performed to characterize fatigue performance, then material conditions can be tested, but it is difficult to reproduce the exact conditions present in the component due to production limitations and material responses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of fatigue performance characterizationVSAvoidreproducibility of material conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of component geometries and material conditions through 3D modeling and digital twins, allowing exact replication of complex geometries and material states without physical manufacturing limitations. This enables accurate fatigue testing of virtual coupons that perfectly match component conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical mechanical testing of actual components with computational mechanics models and simulations. These digital models substitute for physical coupon testing, eliminating the need to manually manufacture and test physical coupons while maintaining accuracy in predicting fatigue performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If a broad range of samples are tested to capture important behavior, then more comprehensive data is obtained, but the number of tests increases and results depend on operator experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of fatigue behavior dataVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computational analysis and modeling before physical testing to identify which test parameters and coupon configurations are most critical. This preliminary digital screening reduces the number of physical tests needed while ensuring comprehensive coverage of important fatigue behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements iterative feedback loops where computational model predictions are continuously refined based on actual test results. This feedback mechanism allows the system to learn from each test and optimize future testing strategies, reducing redundant tests while maintaining data completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If actual components are printed and test specimens are cut out to achieve exact material conditions, then accurate material characterization is achieved, but the cost and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of material conditionsVSAvoidcomplexity of testing setup
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates accurate digital copies and virtual models of the actual component geometries and material conditions. These virtual coupons replicate the exact material state, build orientation, and geometric features without requiring physical component manufacturing and specimen extraction, thereby reducing complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the testing process into computational modeling phases and physical testing phases. By separating the complex geometry replication task into digital 3D modeling, the system avoids the need to physically manufacture entire components just for testing, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12492975B2Method and system for generating a test coupon specification for predicting fatigue life of a component
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 SIEMENS IND SOFTWARE NV
  • US12492975B2 patent drawing
  • US12492975B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for generating a test coupon specification for predicting fatigue life of a component includes determining a load condition for the component, providing a component design, and performing a strength analysis of the component design under the load condition determining a critical area of the component and a stress-related parameter of the critical area. The method includes providing a material condition of the component at least for the critical area of the component. To assist an end-user in determining which are optimal tests to be performed in order to obtain most relevant data for fatigue prediction of a specific component, the method also includes providing a material model and providing, as an input to the material model, the stress-related parameter, and the material condition. The material model generates, as an output, a test coupon specification for being tested in a testing machine.