Immunological Test Device Stop Button Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In immunological test apparatuses, there is a risk of chemical solutions for sensitization processing adhering to users when the stop button is operated during tests, especially when droplets remain on the carrier, potentially causing chemical burns or staining.

Innovation Solution

The immunological test apparatus includes a function switching unit that deactivates the stop button's function during sensitization processing, preventing the chemical solution from adhering to users by not displaying the stop button when sensitization processing starts, and using a driving controller to initiate sensitization processing if a determination result is not obtained within a set time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the stop button is made operational during the test, then the user can stop the test at any timing, but there is a risk that remaining chemical solution droplets on the carrier will adhere to the user's hand causing chemical burns or staining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control capabilityVSAvoidchemical solution adhesion to user
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by detecting the start of sensitization processing before the user can operate the stop button, and proactively disables the stop button function. The control unit monitors the test progress and determines when sensitization processing has started, then prevents the stop button from being operational during this critical phase, thereby eliminating the harmful effect before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the test progress and the state of the carrier. The control unit receives feedback about the test timing and determines whether sensitization processing is underway based on this feedback. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures the stop button is disabled at the appropriate moment when chemical solution droplets are present on the carrier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If sensitization processing is performed to increase coloration density, then detection sensitivity is improved, but chemical solution droplets remain on the carrier during processing creating safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoloration detection sensitivityVSAvoidchemical solution droplets on carrier
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the potentially harmful presence of chemical solution droplets on the carrier during sensitization processing into a beneficial control signal. The control unit detects that sensitization processing is underway (when droplets are present) and uses this information to disable the stop button, thereby transforming the hazardous condition into a trigger for safety enhancement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the stop button function is disabled during sensitization processing, then user safety is protected from chemical solution adhesion, but the user cannot stop the test if needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical solution adhesion preventionVSAvoidtest stopping capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The stop button functionality is made dynamic rather than static. The control unit adjusts the operational state of the stop button based on the current test phase. During sensitization processing when chemical solution droplets are present on the carrier, the stop button is disabled. During other phases when no droplets are present, the stop button remains operational. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by providing safety when needed while maintaining operational flexibility when safe.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively prevents chemical solutions from adhering to users during and after tests, ensuring user safety and maintaining the integrity of the testing process by ensuring the stop button is not operational during sensitization processing.

Implementation Method 1

a chemical solution for sensitizing the state of coloration (increasing the density of coloration) of a reagent, for example, a solution of a silver ion-containing compound, such as silver nitrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSilver amplification: Redox Reactions

Implementation Method 2

measures the coloration state (density, chromaticity) of the reagent based on an imaging signal obtained by the imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectColor development: Chemical Bonding

Data Source

PatentEP3584578B1Immunological test device and operation method for same
Publication Date: 2021.05.12 FUJIFILM CORP
  • EP3584578B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3584578B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3584578B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

There are provided an immunological test apparatus and an operation method thereof capable of preventing a chemical solution for sensitization processing from adhering to a user. An immunological test apparatus (10) displays a stop button (activates a function of a stop button) during a period from the start of a test to a set time (TS) (0 < TP ≤ TS), that is, before sensitization processing is started. On the other hand, the stop button is not displayed (function of the stop button is deactivated) during a period from the set time (TS) to a time (TE) (TS < TP ≤ TE), that is, after the sensitization processing is started.