Test Fabric Design for Adhesion Testing of Fiber Composites

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for testing the adhesion of materially bonded joining connections, particularly in fiber composite materials, are complex, costly, and prone to falsification due to fabric tearing during mechanical testing, which complicates the determination of admissible parameter spaces and bond quality.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a Dutch-weave or square-mesh fabric as a test fabric, which allows adhesive penetration and eliminates edge tearing by creating a cohesive fracture, enabling accurate adhesion testing without edge sealing, and can be produced efficiently and cost-effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If coarse-meshed fabric with large pores is used to enable adhesive penetration and cohesive fracture, then adhesion testing capability is improved, but fabric strength decreases leading to edge tearing during mechanical testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion testing capabilityVSAvoidfabric strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The fabric is segmented into different regions with different mesh sizes: the central test region uses coarse-meshed fabric with large pores for adhesive penetration and cohesive fracture, while the edge regions use fine-meshed fabric for strength and tear resistance. This segmentation allows each region to fulfill its specific function without compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the fabric are assigned different qualities: the central area has high porosity for adhesion testing while the edges have low porosity for structural integrity. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between needing open pores for adhesive penetration and requiring strong edges to prevent tearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If edge sealing is applied to prevent fabric tearing, then test result reliability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest result reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabric is designed with predetermined regional differentiation before testing, where edge regions are inherently stronger due to fine mesh construction. This preliminary structural preparation eliminates the need for additional edge sealing operations, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If fine-meshed fabric is used to prevent tearing, then fabric strength is improved, but adhesive penetration capability decreases affecting adhesion verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric strengthVSAvoidadhesion testing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fabric is divided into functional zones: a central test zone with coarse mesh for adhesive penetration and a surrounding edge zone with fine mesh for strength. This segmentation allows both requirements to be satisfied simultaneously in different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fabric exhibits spatially varying porosity and strength characteristics, with high porosity in the center for adhesive interaction and low porosity at edges for mechanical integrity, resolving the contradiction between penetration capability and strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If large sealing edges are used to prevent fabric tearing, then test reliability is improved, but substrate size requirements increase leading to higher costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest reliabilityVSAvoidsubstrate size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The fabric's edge regions are pre-designed with fine mesh construction that inherently provides tear resistance without requiring large sealing margins. This preliminary structural design reduces the required substrate size while maintaining test reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides accurate, unfalsified test results with reduced costs and increased efficiency by preventing fabric tearing and eliminating the need for edge sealing, allowing better identification of bond quality characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

a Dutch-weave fabric and/or a square-mesh fabric is provided and used as the test fabric

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Implementation Method 2

creates a cohesive fracture, enabling accurate adhesion testing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCohesive fracture: Fracture Mechanics

Data Source

PatentUS12168326B2Method for producing a test specimen
Publication Date: 2024.12.17 DEUTSCHES ZENTRUM FÜR LUFT UND RAUMFAHRT E V
  • US12168326B2 patent drawing
  • US12168326B2 patent drawing
  • US12168326B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for producing a test body (30) for mechanically destructively testing a materially bonded joining connection, wherein the method comprises the following steps:providing an areal fiber composite substrate formed from a fiber composite material which has a fiber material and matrix material in which the fiber material is embedded,applying at least one test fabric and an adhesive to a substrate surface of the areal fiber composite substrate, andcuring the adhesive, and therefore a materially bonded joining connection is produced between the test fabric and the substrate surface by way of the cured adhesive,wherein a Dutch-weave fabric and/or a square-mesh fabric is provided as the test fabric.