Test Leader for Distributed System Testing Coordination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing testing systems for distributed computing systems face challenges in coordinating operations across multiple, disparate components, require significant human intervention, and inefficient resource allocation, leading to inadequate and unreliable testing of complex scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A test leader provisions and directs resources and operations for multiple test suites, optimizing resource allocation and timing to ensure reliable testing of distributed systems, reducing human intervention and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If test suites are coordinated manually by human operators, then testing can be performed with simple system setup, but significant operator intervention is required and testing efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of test suite coordinationVSAvoidcomplexity of test coordination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A test leader component is introduced as an intermediary between test suites and test elements. The test leader receives test suite definitions, provisions necessary resources, directs test elements to execute specific operations, and collects results. This mediator automates the coordination process that would otherwise require manual human intervention, resolving the contradiction between automation extent and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The test leader autonomously provisions resources and directs test operations without requiring continuous human intervention. The system self-manages the coordination of multiple test suites across distributed test elements, automatically allocating resources and scheduling operations based on test suite requirements, thereby achieving high automation while maintaining manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If multiple test suites are executed with separate resource allocation, then each test suite can be configured independently, but resource allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of resource allocationVSAvoidindependence of test suite configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The test leader serves multiple test suites simultaneously, acting as a universal coordinator that can manage diverse test configurations. Resources are provisioned once and shared across multiple test suites through the test leader's centralized control, enabling efficient resource allocation while maintaining the ability to configure each test suite independently for its specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple test suites are merged under a single test leader that coordinates their execution. The test leader consolidates resource management for multiple test suites, allowing resources to be shared and reused across different test configurations. This combining approach improves allocation efficiency while the test leader maintains the flexibility to accommodate different test suite requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If test elements operate independently without coordination, then system setup is simplified, but reliable testing of distributed scenarios becomes inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of distributed system testingVSAvoidcomplexity of coordination mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test leader acts as a coordinating intermediary that synchronizes operations across distributed test elements. It directs test elements to perform specific operations in coordinated sequences, ensuring that timing-critical scenarios are tested reliably. This mediation provides the necessary coordination for reliable distributed system testing while keeping the complexity managed through a single coordinating component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The test leader provisions resources and directs test element operations in advance according to test suite definitions. By pre-coordinating the sequence of operations and resource allocation before test execution begins, the system ensures reliable testing of time-critical scenarios without requiring complex real-time coordination mechanisms during actual test runtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If human operators manually select and execute test suites, then resource provisioning is simplified, but significant operator intervention is required and productivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of test executionVSAvoidease of test suite execution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The test leader autonomously provisions resources and directs test execution without requiring manual operator intervention for each test suite. The system self-manages the entire test workflow from resource allocation to result collection, dramatically improving productivity while the test suite definitions provide clear specifications that maintain operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Test suite definitions are prepared in advance with complete specifications for resource requirements and expected operations. The test leader uses these pre-defined specifications to automatically provision resources and execute tests without requiring operators to make decisions during runtime. This preliminary preparation enables high automation productivity while keeping the interface simple for test creators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11036603B1Distributed test suite tools
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 SCALE COMPUTING INC
  • US11036603B1 patent drawing
  • US11036603B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Reliably testing distributed systems in which multiple components interact, including: provisioning resources by a test leader, directing components to perform actions required by test suites, and reporting results. Provisioning resources might be batched in advance, and might overlap resources for multiple test suites. Provisioning and directing might occur on an as-needed basis, might be performed concurrently, and might be reordered for relatively better performance. Directing actions might occur on command by test leaders, might occur by synchronization of resources, or might occur by resources requesting permission to proceed. Resources might act only upon direction by test leaders, or might act on their own initiative when synchronized. Results might be reported to the test leader for comparison, maintained in a database for access by the test leader, or compared by resources on their own initiative in response to instructions from the test leader.