Test Management System Data Set Segmentation for Vehicle Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current test management systems face challenges in efficiently managing and reproducing vehicle tests across different environments and models, leading to errors and inefficiencies due to the complexity of setting and managing data for various test scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A test management system that divides and manages data into sets for each execution mode and test environment, allowing for both actual and virtual model testing, with features like data distribution, time management, and log storage to facilitate consistent and reproducible tests across development, verification, and operation systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If test data is managed without division across different execution modes and test environments, then data management is simplified, but setting errors occur and convenience of use deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of useVSAvoiddata management structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments test data into distinct data sets based on execution modes (development, verification, operation) and test environments. Each data set contains only the data necessary for its specific purpose, preventing mixing of unrelated data and eliminating setting errors while maintaining organized management structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of data organization by categorizing data sets along multiple axes: execution mode (development/verification/operation) and test environment type. This multi-dimensional classification enables precise data retrieval and prevents errors by ensuring the correct data set is used for each specific test scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If test data is not divided into separate data sets for different execution modes and test environments, then data management is simpler, but setting errors occur and data accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoiddata management structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments test data into distinct data sets based on execution modes (development, verification, operation) and test environments. Each data set contains only the data necessary for its specific purpose, preventing mixing of unrelated data and eliminating setting errors while maintaining organized management structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each data set is configured with local quality characteristics specific to its execution mode and test environment. Development data sets contain configuration and parameter data, verification data sets contain test case and expected result data, and operation data sets contain actual test execution data. This localized data quality ensures accuracy for each specific test purpose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If virtual models are not used for testing, then test accuracy for difficult-to-obtain models deteriorates, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest accuracyVSAvoidtesting system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual model data sets that are copies or representations of actual vehicle models. These virtual models replicate the essential characteristics and behaviors of physical vehicles, enabling accurate testing of models that are difficult or expensive to obtain physically while maintaining test validity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows parameter changes between actual and virtual model data sets. By adjusting parameters such as model fidelity, test environment conditions, and data representation formats, the system can switch between actual vehicle testing and virtual model testing based on the specific requirements of each test scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If tests are not reproduced using past results, then productivity improves through fresh testing, but loss of time increases due to redundant test setup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest execution efficiencyVSAvoidtest setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent stores test results and configuration data from past executions in structured data sets. When the same or similar tests need to be run again, the system retrieves and reuses these pre-prepared data sets, eliminating the need to recreate test configurations and significantly reducing setup time while maintaining test validity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230211795A1Test management system using data set and method therefor
Publication Date: 2023.07.06 HYUNDAI AUTOEVER
  • US20230211795A1 patent drawing
  • US20230211795A1 patent drawing
  • US20230211795A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are a system and a method for managing and performing a test using a data set. More particularly, the test management system enables data to be easily managed by generating and managing data sets for each execution mode and for each test environment.